this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
305 points (100.0% liked)

196

16500 readers
2566 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text: Five dices. Top left corner is a three, top right corner is a six, bottom left corner is also a six and bottom right corner is two threes forming a straight angle.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 83 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Can anybody help me understand this? I can't make it be 196 or anything. I'm at a loss.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Thought it was a 196 joke at first and now I'm just irritated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How though? I'm really not getting it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

1, 2, 2, 1 and 1 laying down. Classic loss.jpg

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I’m now committed to getting this to work, but I’m not quite there.

(6^3) - 6 * 3 - 3 = 195 Beyond this, I’m quite lost on how this can be done with simple arithmetic.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you allow factorials:

6^3 - 6! / (3! * 3!) = 196

Edit: also 66*3 - 3!/3 = 196

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Factorials or something more than basic arithmetic (+exponents) is needed as I went ahead and programmatically checked every expression without parenthesis and the closest would always be 195. Interestingly, all values within a difference of 10 were multiples of 3.

A lost cause indeed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If we allow combining digits to make larger numbers (like kittehx's edit) we can actually do

(33*6) - (6/3) = 196

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

How did I not try that? Now I feel dumb lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly, all values within a difference of 10 were multiples of 3.

If it's limited to basic arithmetic (+-*/) and no parenthesis, would there be any answer possible that's not a multiple of 3? My first thought is telling me that common order of operations would make any equation using the numbers in the OP and the restrictions laid out would always amount to a multiple of 3.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That was my initial thought, but you can do add or sub by 2 (6 / 3) to get a non-multiple of 3. I had to double check and see that there were in fact values of i.e. x.5 within I think a difference of 64, can’t remember the exact values or their expressions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Oh yep, my bad. It's always division that throws me in math expressions that have multiple steps to them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

(6!/3!)*1.633

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It's "loss", a sad famous meme comic

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Was it about a haiku?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is that fucking loss? I stg...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Loss is the new Rickroll.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't know if this is referencing Loss or Full House...

:O

Lamenting the loss of Full House? 🤔 You must really like that show.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Can anyone explain to me why Loss became so popular? I never saw it until I joined Lemmy and I've seen a couple dozen posts based on it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

It's like a comedy cemetery type of meme

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

At this point it's an internet inside joke, and like any niche inside joke, there's a bit of a rush when you recognize it, that you're in on something special. In the beginning it was mostly just mocking the absurd sudden tone shift in the original Ctrl+Alt+Del comic but like a lot of memes it seems to have evolved and now the fun is creating and finding the loss pattern in unique and different ways.

I like it, it's fun

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am almost certain the only reason it ever blew up was because it's a pretty strong comic, alone, but the fact it can be represented by just a few lines such that nearly any 4 images can become a reference to the comic makes it highly memeable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

It also became memeable and noteworthy because it's it's drastically off tone for the comic strip it came from. Generally a light hearted series and then BAM, have something that in context is utterly brutal.

Nowadays it's so divorced from it's context that it's essentially just a meme.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Google en passant

And all will be revealed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

That's a chess move. Are you stupid? Go back to asulme.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

There are no words.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I'm at Loss of words...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

This is a full house! You can be proud of yourself! Don't shy away!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

those 6 sides look fucked up tho

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

FULL BOAT, THREES! HAH!