tumblr in this case.
some people have decided to discredit all ai art as "not real art", implying that "art" is a quality that is bestowed upon a thing by its creator.
this is bullshit to me because i believe that anything can be art to someone and that decrying ai art as bad because it's somehow not real art is a thought terminating cliche that distracts from the reality that image generators are made through the exploitation of milions of unpaid artist's work.
the user behind this is some "jamie0723", both they and the subs they've made have no posts and link back to sites that i can only assume are a scams or grifts. block they ass
hasn't aggroed yet
that would be very funny
"steal his look"
it says "towards" so not necessarily downhill
oh, no problem! yea i think instance devs should add a way to filter out posts with certain keywords
hm yes Cunt or whatever his name was
should i add it in the post's body so you can filter it?
view more: next ›
nicknonya
joined 11 months ago
the thing is i don't think a meaningful definition of art can exist. any attempt would necessarily leave something out. you can look at a crack in a random wall on your way to the shop and think it's art.
is all art necessarily good? No, obviously not, but if looking at a wonky ai landscape (or let's be honest with ourselves, massive honking ai tits) means something to you than that's art to you.