Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
It's also pretty shocking to find out what y'all have to deal with. German healthcare can be mildly annoying at times (the bureaucracy of finding the right form to fill out to get something like psychotherapy approved can be tedious), but I've never heard of anyone here getting their request dismissed without a good, legally predefined, reason. Apparently American Healthcare companies can just say no just because they feel like it?? whack.
my ukrainian coworker recently was dealing with something with our healthcare company and she was like "wait. y'all weren't exaggerating? you actually have to fight for your right to get medical care here?" and we were like "we been saying. america's online presence is a cry for help"
Initially, yes. Then you appeal the claim. Then your appeal gets denied. Then you call with the claim number and challenge the result of your appeal. Then the insurance company contacts the doctor to verify necessity. If your doctor successfully convinces your provider that they know more about medicine than a corporate insurance company, then you’ll be the lucky recipient of an approval.
Source: 20+ specialist appointments and scans per year for the last five years
I'll never forget when I was prescribed a medication for a heart condition, literally crucial for me to continue living, and the insurance company denied the claim. Without insurance it was $600/mo at a time when I was making $5.25/hr.
And this applies to all treatment.
Coworker that was a double breast cancer survivor was denied coverage for the drug that kept the cancer from coming back again. Like, they want you to die so you don't cost them money.
Maybe this is the time Americans actually think about the value of an institution who's only purpose is to extract wealth from normal people.
My dad survived colon cancer but then any further colonoscopy was denied for five years because it was no longer "preventative".
I really don’t get how your insurance company can be like “you need this treatment to live” (Or anaesthesia is vital for an operation, and an insurance company just be like “nah…”.
I remember the phone call with the insurance clearly. I asked the lady on the phone, "I don't understand - my doctor says this is crucial but you're saying I can't have it?" And she said, verbatim, "I'm not saying you don't need it or can't have it. I'm saying we're not going to pay for it." And when I told her "Then you're giving me a death sentence." she went silent. I ended up stretching my one month doses over 3 months so it was "only" $200/mo.
That’s inhumane. I wonder if the person on the other end of the phone just didn’t give a shit or what…
She probably had no authority to do anything about it. Delay, deny, defend…she’s part of deny/defend. She’s there to tell you that you were rejected, not to explain why or appeal. If a doctor calls, they’ll go into “you didn’t submit X step of paperwork declaring the patient has Y, and so even though you noted it elsewhere we’re denying”
Going off script risks her job, and for what? By design, she can do nothing to actually help
It's actually an easy translation. "Nah" means "we don't anticipate you being capable of paying us more than what we'd have to spend to give this to you, so if you can't find cheaper the more lucrative option is letting you die."
Yeah, they’re in it to make money, not to provide a health service. I forgot that bit.
It's been real popular to knock Americans around these parts for a while, I've noticed, and we certainly earn our share of it. But I get the sense Europeans don't quite understand how bad things have gotten here and how truly cornered and out of options many of us feel. Folks are being squeezed past their breaking point.
Impossible to guess exactly when that'll be true for enough people to cause something dramatic, but any populace has its limit and we seem to be approaching it. I really hope we start heading the other direction soon, but this incoming administration does not make that look likely.
Your incoming administration won’t do a thing for your average person. If it’s any consolation we Brits aren’t far behind.
Well, I don't really mean this as a positive per se, but it's entirely possible the incoming administration tosses a few crumbs to keep things just simmering (while of course further dismantling everything of any real value). That's been the playbook for the power brokers for some time. I didn't mean there was some possibility there'd be any actual good. The incoming folks are essentially the most predatory version of that class of people, I'm under no illusions.
Edit to add: I tentatively reject the idea that your country is not far behind, respectfully. That's my point. I am fairly sure the differences are bigger than you realize.
Appreciated. Whatever you do the U.K. likes to copy though. I suppose it’s like karma for introducing Thatcher and Reagan.
Slight correction the incoming administration is likely to do quite a bit for the average person.
All of it's going to be bad, but they're gonna do quite a bit.
Edit: Or one way to look at it is that they're going to do a lot to the average person not for the average person.
TBH it was hard for me to wrap my head around Europe's healthcare, I've was always told that it was similar to where I'm from (Scotland) but I would read about insurance and employer healthcare and be really confused, since up here everything (prescriptions, glasses, teeth) is free and there's no insurance.
There's been stories of tourists asking where to pay / show their insurance card and the receptionist at the hospital would shrug and say that they don't know what to do.
I’m from (Scotland) but I would read about insurance and employer healthcare and be really confused, since up here everything (prescriptions, glasses, teeth) is free and there’s no insurance.
I'm in England, and I know there is a difference, but I highly doubt private insurers haven't made it up your way, and are slowly carving the NHS hollow from within just like they are down here (a very superficial look confirms that hundreds of millions are already being spent on private firms carrying out NHS Scotland work).
People get denied NHS treatment all the time, if not directly (and yes, some directly, like trans people, but also disabled people with long term and complex cases, which I know from personal experience), then via cuts and waiting times.
Sure, we have it better than the yanks, and you up north have it better than us down south, but please lets not pretend our NHS is in good shape (or hands, Starmer has made it clear that he is for more privatisation), providing prompt and accessible healthcare, or not going the exact same way the US healthcare system is (often being bought up by the very same companies).
The last thing we need is to be getting complacent.
That sounds nice and simple! I don't 100% understand the German system either, I just know that it costs about 15% of my income each month (half is paid by my employer), and if my doctor writes a prescription on a pink sheet of paper, the meds don't cost me more than like 5-10€ (apparently it's some sort of co-pay thing).
We also have a system for private health insurance, because people employed by the government aren't allowed to benefit from the government-subsidized health insurances. But I'm not earning enough to know specifics about it haha
I’m English, I’m jealous of the eyes and teeth thing.
Scotland seems almost utopian.
It was even worse before the ACA. Before then, insurance could kick you off your plan for no reason and refuse to cover new users for pre-existing conditions.
In practice, the way this worked was quite simple: You got cancer, your insurance canceled your plan, and then they would refuse to give you a new plan because you had a pre-existing condition - cancer.
I had a knee surgery last year and while dealing with my insurance company was a pain about equal to the surgery itself, they ultimately had to pay for rehab because they couldn’t disagree that rehab after a surgery like this is absolutely necessary
I've got UHC and I recently had a hernia surgery.
When I went in about my hernia, because it was hurting really bad, they ended up finding another hernia that wasn't causing any pain. But because the other one wasn't causing any pain, UHC denied my surgery to fix the one that wasn't causing pain because it wasn't deemed medically necessary.
So basically when I went in to fix the one hernia, the doctor couldn't fix the other hernia because UHC wouldn't cover that half of the surgery.
So I'm sitting here years later with a hernia that I'm just waiting on the day that it starts hurting so that I can go spend another few thousand dollars fixing all because UHC didn't want to pay for preventative maintenance.
Edit: And I almost forget the best part, after the surgery they took 5 months to pay because they wanted to ensure that the other hernia wasn't fixed. And because they took so long to pay when I had to pay it was a nightmare for me using my FSA account for it.
Fuck UHC.
Numerous times since the 50s USA health insurance companies have decided some policies are costing too much money, so they have cancelled the policy.
Years later, and I'm still with Hillary on this one... WHY IS THERE A GARDEN IN THE SINK!?
Not sure if you're serious or not but it's an easy way to water your plants all the way through without making a wet mess. Everyplace I've ever worked at this is how we watered the office plants.
This is how I water them at home.
Put plant in sink. Soak with water. Allow to drain. Use draining as an excuse not to do dishes. Get irritated with myself for not putting the plant back as I catch myself needing to drain the pasta I'm cooking for dinner so I shuffle shit around while almost burning myself. Put plant back.
This is standard procedure.
So far I only see dead people and no changes whatsoever. Remains to be seen if there is going to be any improvement whatsoever (considering Trump isn't even in office yet, it's probably going to get worse), though at least the owners and top-level managers are probably more scared than before.
People would need to start fighting a guerilla war against insurance companies, and I don't think they have high chances of winning that war.
Blue Cross rolled back their decision on anesthesia, which was they would say how long a procedure should take and if it goes longer than they wouldn't cover the cost of anesthesia.
So that's 1 win.
It's also got a lot of people openly talking about improving our shitty healthcare system.
Plus it only happened a couple days ago, people need time to stew. And the rightwing media siding with the CEO is even coming across as deaf to the concerns of the conservatives I know.
It’s the natural solution and I’m surprised it’s taken so long. I hope he stays free.
I mean I guess it's the last solution, after laws that work for people, politics that work for people etc etc
Even if the attacker gets caught, if it changes minds enough to overhaul the American healthcare system then you could say it was worth doing, when compared to the many lives lost to corporate greed.
I doubt it will but let's see!
Two issues:
~ The problem persist despite the incident. Maybe this is the beginning of a sea change for healthcare in the US, but so far, it's a single ring wave in the pond.
~ Europe is no stranger to problems being solved, including each other, via violence.
100% This moment can help galvanize people to the need to fix our Healthcare, but random acts of violence won't fix it, people organizing together will.
I'm going to take that to mean organized violence, which is true and based
The problem persist despite the incident. Maybe this is the beginning of a sea change for healthcare in the US, but so far, it’s a single ring wave in the pond.
not really, they turned back on their anesthesia claims, people have been getting their requests approved.
If they start going back on it, I'm sure another CEO shooting will clear that right up for them again.
How do you think we got healthcare? By begging kings? No, we got it as result of revolution.
Well.
Russian and Chinese people having a revolution and scaring the bourgeoisie into compromise.
What revolution would that have been? From my limited understanding universal healthcare emerged as a byproduct of the industislistation, when states where confronted with a fast growing population of poor citizens that flocked to the cities and needed caring for in some sense. Bismarck intruduced the first European Healthcare system with the goal of keeping workers alive and healthy.
So, to answer my own question, if anything then the industrial revolution (aka capitalism) gave us healthcare.
Somehow I don't think that's where you were going with your comment.
What revolution would that have been?
October revolution. It gave healthcare, 100% literacy and education in general. And by "in general" I also mean higher education, which America also lacks.
Lol, absolutely fucking not.
More like
(perhaps not in abolishing the system quite yet, but in finally understanding the inevitability of how that'll have to happen)
idk why the username was cropped out but this absolute BANGER of a tweet was made by gldivittorio just saying this because i absolutely love her work and she’s really based as a bonus to being funny
Can't argue with results
« It’s not stupid if it works «