402
submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

Trump on Saturday argued it was “too late” to have another presidential debate because Americans have begun casting their ballots in the 2024 election.

He has no clue when the election is and is looking for an excuse to say no. I’m sure a staffer told him this idea.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago

I heard somewhere that we might expect Trump to flip on this when he realizes it leaves Vance as the last one in the debate spotlight.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago

I'll just repeat someone else's idea I saw elsewhere on Lemmy. She and Walz should challenge Trump and Vance to a marksmanship contest down at the gun range. He'd never go for it, but the image is hilarious. Admittedly, it would loose Harris some support from her base, but it would lose Trump a lot more from his to see him being shown up in such a visible way on one of his base's favorite topics. Harris has stated that she is a gun owner, and you know she's the type to take safety and skill training before she ever bought one, while on the other hand, if pansy-ass Trump has ever handled a live firearm in his life I will eat my hat. Both VP candidates have military training, but I'd still expect a pretty big skill gap between a decorated career infantry NCO and a newspaper staffer in a uniform.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I’d settle for an old fashioned duel at 10 paces.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

Do it Jeopardy style. Goad him in by saying we're going to determine who the smartest candidate is once and for all. Invite Stein to keep it interesting.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

That's a great idea. Since Trump has declined, invite Stein in his place.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 6 hours ago

If he saying he's not going to be there, you know he's 100% going to be there. He's many terrible things, but he's consistent AF when it comes to doing the exact opposite of what comes out of his mouth.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 9 hours ago

Republicans want to shield their senior citizen from showing off his cognitive decline.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

That's why they need to make it personal: call him out as scared, he'll take the bait sure as shit

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

Hmm, reminds me of another republican tv-host-turned-president 🤔

[-] [email protected] 129 points 11 hours ago

She's going to show up, he won't, and it'll be an opportunity to take tough questions without having to share time and a stage with a gasbag idiot.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I actually think that would probably go poorly for Harris. The mistake-tolerance for Harris is tiny because left and left-leaning voters are often hyper-purity idealogues. Trump's supporters are also working on a purity ideology, but they are extremely mistake-tolerant because their purity test is literally supporting Trump. He's basically one, long series of mistakes and it barely moves his numbers.

Harris does not have that luxury by any stretch of the imagination.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 11 hours ago

I'm actually kind of worried that this will happen. In that vacuum she's going to use the time to bridge the gap between the left and the right. The last thing I really want from her is more talk about supporting fracking, more soft stance on Palestine, and more words about hardline on immigration. I get that she's trying to draw more of the right in politically but I'm also worried that she is dangerously close to having the far left get disenfranchised.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 10 hours ago

Serious question.

What percentage of the population do you consider 'Far Left?'

So radicalized that they actually believe that there's no difference between Harris and Trump?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's a diminishingly small number. For instance Gaza is a loud issue with strong divides. But polling shows it's a very tiny fraction for whom it's a deciding factor in their vote preference. It's just that the tiny fraction of people is very loud, typically young, and on social media like Lemmy.

For many of this tiny minority, it has become more a personality than a political or even ethical issue. They're wildly overrepresented in, for instance, discourse on Lemmy; conversely, they represent a tiny, almost meaningless amount of voters who would not vote for Harris because of it, no matter how many all-caps posts they make about EVERYONE ELSE IS VOTING FOR GENOCIDE.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Also, they never seem to notice what Trump did to the Kurds.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

A higher % of those over 65 support Israel than the % of those under 35 that support Palestine. Those over 65 vote, those under 35 don't. That last fact is true no matter the country and no matter if there's a party centered around what younger people want. It makes no political sense to go and cater to people who won't vote anyway.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I hate this, but it's true.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

You're getting downvotes. Sad, because you're only telling what is true.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

And I get it, it sucks but getting elected depends on getting votes and if there's a group that doesn't vote no matter what then it's no wonder the strategy doesn't revolve around them.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I think the far left (if they're going to vote) aren't likely to be pushed away by more moderation from Harris. They're already far more politically engaged than the vast majority of people. Meanwhile, there are a lot of apolitical people who dislike Trump, but just don't want to vote and feel like they don't know enough about Kamala to feel comfortable voting for her (my Catholic Republican mother, for example). I think that group probably has more people in it than the far left does, and more exposure to Kamala's normalcy relative to Trump is a good thing for swaying them, given the shift in the polls following the last debate. I'll always be disappointed when the Dems pivot right instead of left, but I think the logic is sound in this case.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Each of these swings out into right field are wedges that the right uses to drive people toward independent votes.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

They will feel that the value of their vote isn't worth the time to cast it. They will no longer be driven to vote and will stay at home. That this effect will negate, if not cripple, the numbers we'd have even with whatever moderate right can be convinced to vote.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

That's not what disenfranchised means. If someone has a choice to vote, including choosing to abstain, they are not disenfranchised.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 11 hours ago

Nah he'll be there, his ego won't let him stay away. We'll have to hear it sane washed as his "just stay tuned" showmanship master plan, but we'll know it's just ego.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

Never know, those bone spurs might act up again and prevent him from appearing.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

He really wanted to do it but he was too tired. Sad!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

"tough" questions.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 11 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

👏Koka 👏koka 👏koka 👏kaw!

[-] [email protected] 21 points 11 hours ago

He'll do it, but only at Fox, or better yet NewsMax.

Maybe RT actually.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago

CNN is right wing like FOX now btw

They changed ownership in 2022 and their ideology and business model was to mimic the tenets of ”journalism” that FOX news uses. Here is a good article on the change and if you’re paying attention you’ll notice their Trump coverage is much friendlier than 4 years ago.

Why billionaire John Malone’s shadow looms over CNN

“I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing,” he said. Then he suggested a model: “Fox News, in my opinion, has followed an interesting trajectory of trying to have ‘news’ news, I mean some actual journalism, embedded in a program schedule of all opinions.”

https://www.vox.com/2022/8/26/23322761/cnn-john-malone-david-zaslav-chris-licht-brian-stelter-fox-peter-kafka-column

[-] [email protected] 18 points 11 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago

Trump just wants a level playing field, so it's important that all questions - whether for Trump or for Harris - be approved by Putin personally.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago

It’s Saturday Night!!!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

truth social live stream brought to you by Liberty Financial.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Once was enough. VP debate is coming soon, then it will be time for the election.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

And once again, he'll decline.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

trump failing to show up should be marked as fear

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

S̶h̶o̶w̶d̶o̶w̶n̶ Beatdown

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
402 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3329 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS