Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.
Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.
Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.
Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.
~ /c/nostupidquestions
If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!
This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.
Start here...
...proceed here.
As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.
The people who made God's Not Dead made another movie full of lies? What?
I’m shocked! Shocked I say!
Religious grifting: the world's newest profession
The start of the Bible explains that God said the priestly family should get the best of all the meat and other offerings plus endless other benefits, powers and exceptions. It's an age old game
I wouldn't say it's anywhere near new.
Pharaohs got their subjects to build giant pyramids for them.
The medium is newish in comparison to the con
“Religion, the ideology that ignores facts”
Given that the Supreme Court made up facts about this (the ruling said it was just a moment of quiet reflection when in reality it was on the fifty yard line, with literal tv cameras, and pressure for the kids to participate or they might not play. I don’t think it is surprising that movie writers would.
I believe it was the lawyers who made up the facts and the SCOTUS justices who accepted them without skepticism. Not that it makes it any better.
So…fiction, like everything else to do with religion.
So did the Supreme Court actually
Facts aren't a concern of the intended audience.
The MOVIE!?!!
Goddammit
Average Joe is not on Wikipedia or IMDB, so it's either waaaay early, or the film community isn't taking it seriously. I can't find a production company (Typically Pure Flix for Evangelical Christian propaganda flims like the GND series). There's a book on Amazon, and I assume it's related.
It might be worth seeing the case that SCOTUS decided this based on false facts, and the lack of due diligence during discovery is conspicuous. But by now we know the Federalist Society is about securing autocracy with theocratic and corporatist features here in the US.
Let me guess, Tebow’s dumb ass is involved somehow