this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
263 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4567 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
263
Permanently Deleted (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Brett Kavanaugh, the US supreme court justice, will “step up” for Donald Trump and help defeat attempts to remove the former president from the ballots in Colorado and Maine for inciting an insurrection, a Trump lawyer said.

“I think it should be a slam dunk in the supreme court,” Alina Habba told Fox News on Thursday night. “I have faith in them.

“You know, people like Kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he’ll step up. Those people will step up. Not because they’re pro-Trump but because they’re pro-law, because they’re pro-fairness. And the law on this is very clear.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kavenaugh was appointed by Trump, and the Trump WH protected him from an FBI investigation after the whopping 4k+ tips started rolling in.

He probably shouldnt be part of this ruling… him, the other Trump appointed peeps, and Thomas (who really should just resign,)

[–] [email protected] 92 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

He also committed perjury when he lied about squirting beer up his ass. That's an objective fact about a sitting Supreme Court Justice. Brettt Kavanaugh committed perjury when he lied about squirting beer up his ass.

He also probably sexually assaulted a woman, but we don't know that with absolute certainty. We do know with absolute certainty that he squirted beer up his ass and then lied about it under oath in front of Congress while being interviewed for the job as the highest arbiter of law.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What we do know is Brock Allen Turner raped an unconscious woman behind a dumpster, was only sentenced to 6 months in prison, and was released after 3 fro good behavior. This is a huge case of white, moneyed privilege. Brock Allen Turner is a rapist and should never be allowed to hold a job in the United States.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Oh hey, are you talking about Rapist Brock Allen Turner who has been going by his middle name lately, Rapist Allen Turner?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

he squirted beer up his ass and then lied about it

I mean, I'd lie about that too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I understand why he lied. It's embarrassing, but he was under oath. He swore to God and Country, under penalty of perjury, in front of Congress and the American people, in order to be considered for a position as a Supreme Court Justice, that he wasn't lying. And then he lied.

And everyone knew he was lying. That's what gets me. He committed perjury on camera and nobody called him on it. Everyone just shrugged and moved on, like it didn't matter. Because it didn't matter.

It doesn't matter if the justices are the best, most trustworthy, most honest, most qualified for the job. That's not what matters. What matters is that he will do what he is told, will rule on the cases in a predictable way, and that he will live a very long life. That's why he's sitting on the highest court in the country. Because he's a stooge. He'll lie when it's convenient, he'll hide the truth when it's politically expedient, he'll stretch credibility to get what he wants, and he'll do it for the people paying him, too.

The court is a fraud, and there is no justice.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Justice Kavanaugh hasn't forgotten all those gambling debts that magically disappeared after he perjured himself through his confirmation hearing.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like a not-so-subtle threat.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Habba? I'm not familiar with that term, what does it refer to? Or did you mean Jabba, which is certainly fitting on multiple levels.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Habba is the name of an incompetent lawyer working for Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KvoIDkEsiw

She's his worst lawyer, and he's had some stinkers.

https://newrepublic.com/post/174835/trumps-idiot-lawyer-undermines-case-moments-arrest

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I mean, it makes sense the quality of lawyers trend downward when you try to stiff each one of them on their payment...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks. Maybe I should pay closer attention to the people surrounding him than I currently do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

No. No, don't do that. It's a waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

It sounds like a blatant admission of corruption. Trump's lawyer just admitted that he expects a quid-pro-quo from Kavanaugh.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that was them talking to Kavenaugh because they're not actually that confident with him.

Know which justice Kavenaugh disagreed with more than any other last term?

Thomas.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes the 14th amendment is very clear. See you in court.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court hasn't cared about clear language or precedent before.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

they pretty much threw out the standing requirement in order to shitcan Biden's attempt to forgive student loans. They're a disgrace.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have complete faith that this illegitimate "supreme" court will rule in whatever way causes the most harm for normal people. That is their function.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

unless he sees a drunk passed out teenage girl that is

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kavanagh has surprised me on a couple of voting rights cases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

He'll protect his boss.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Habba’s reference to Trump “going through hell” was to a stormy confirmation during which Kavanaugh was accused of sexual assault, which he angrily denied.

“The Trump administration outsourced judicial selection efforts to [the rightwing activist] Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society, who hand-picked the current conservative majority, funded their confirmation battles, and have been rewarding them with off-the-books gifts and luxury travel ever since.

“The former president’s lawyer asking judges the Trump administration appointed to ‘step up’ to shield him from consequences is disgraceful and raises significant questions about the independence of the court.”

Michael Kagan, a law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, sounded a “legal ethics alert”, adding that if Kavanaugh “feels in any way that he owes Trump and will ‘step up’, then [Habba] should be sanctioned by the bar for saying this on TV and thus trying to prejudice a proceeding.”

Trump incited the deadly January 6 attack on Congress in 2021, an attempt to stop certification of his defeat by Joe Biden.

In a supreme court filing in the Colorado case, lawyers argued that only Congress could resolve such a dispute and that the presidency was not an office of state as defined in the 14th amendment.


The original article contains 529 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Bought and paid for.