No, but see, what if a person who isn't vegan accidentally eats some vegan food and likes it?

The good news is that, between the XMen and Fantastic Four, Marvel doesn't need the Avengers to be the centerpiece of the cinematic universe anymore. As long as they make good movies with good writing and good productions, they will make money hand over fist.

I would love to see a whole series of Young Avengers movies that don't act as a crossover event, but rather explore the relationships and tribulations of being young superheroes. In fact, if I were writing it, I'd set the movies during the Secret Wars when all of the major superheroes and villains have mysteriously vanished. So Ms. Marvel, Kate Bishop, Riri, Stature, Patriot, Kid Loki, Love, Wiccan, Speed, Skar (if we don't get a Hulkling by then), maybe Phyla, all dealing with what everyone assumes is another Snap.

If this pisses you off, good. Because this is the legal system we have, and it's always been this corrupt. It's always been this unjust, this skewed, and it will continue to be until we demand a change.

Gross. But you're right, denying it just prolonged the news cycle, and creates an incentive for someone to prove it. The guy used to visit a store to masturbate, there's no chance he was careful enough to avoid creating some evidence. He should just ignore the story and try to move passed it.

So it's worse because he was not paying attention to his speed? I could understand if the judge found that it was just as bad as speeding intentionally.

Doesn't believe in guilt-by-association cancel culture?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jd-vance-national-abortion-ban-soros-1235062748/

"No fair using the entirety of what we said to make us look like shitbags!"

I'm confused by this article. It sounds like the normal fine is £65 and 3 points. But the judge says he has "a clear history" and had a reason to be speeding, so "that can't happen here." Instead, he gave Moron a £650 fine and 5 points.

Also, the offender's name is Moron, which is funny but not particularly relevant.

If the judge felt he had a mitigating explanation, why is the penalty worse than normal?

The rifle had a lock for the bayonet that allowed you to reverse the bayonet and stow it in place. Smart design, but two soldiers managed to lock two rifles onto the same bayonet, requiring them to be drilled apart. It's a moderately famous example design engineers use to highlight the importance of UAT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA3VsMteAxk

"Baffling"? No. Frustrating. Maddening. Depressing. But not baffling. We all know who Harris is and where she stands. She's a centrist trying to win an election against a sociopathic despot, so she has my full support. But I don't expect her to be a progressive champion, because that's not who she is. There should be no confusion, no surprise.

I really wish the Arlington employee would press charges. I understand why they won't, but it's really disturbing that the campaign and the candidate are lying about what happened.

Things that are objectively true:

They parroted pro-Putin talking points.

They were paid by Russia.

They claim to be victims of a Russian smear campaign.

How does that even work?