383
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Donald Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, said in the wake of the deadly school shooting in Georgia that the massacres are sadly a “fact of life” and offered ways to fortify schools to make them safer against gun violence.

Kamala Harris put out a statement with Vance’s comments and called for “action to keep our children safe and keep guns out of the hands of criminals.”

And it appeared to strike a nerve with team Trump that she used Vance’s comments against them.

“Kamala’s interns just released a statement pushing FAKE NEWS,” Trump War Room posted to X with its more than 2 million followers. “Watch the full video and you’ll clearly see that JD Vance does not say what they claim he said. These morons do nothing but lie every single day.”

Except Harris’ campaign shared the same video.

Here’s what Vance had to say:

“I don’t like that this is a fact of life,” he said. “But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children they’re not able.”

Vance said he doesn’t like the idea of his own kids going to a school with hardened security, “but that’s increasingly the reality that we live in.”

All of that was in what Harris’ campaign shared with her joint statement on the shooting with running mate Tim Walz. Vance said what team Trump said Vance didn’t say and accused the Harris campaign of distorting.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 181 points 1 week ago

"No fair using the entirety of what we said to make us look like shitbags!"

[-] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago

more like:

"No fair using the entirety of what we said to reveal we are shitbags!"

no one is making them look like anything

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Fascists are the only ones where more context makes them look worse.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They are doing this to themselves

[-] [email protected] 141 points 1 week ago

I like how they say “Watch the full video and you’ll clearly see that JD Vance does not say what they claim he said", knowing that the full video does the opposite, but their fans will never bother clicking on it.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

Maybe the video needs a thumbnail of some open mouthed guy pointing at something. At least thats what virtually all of youtube thinks makes idiots watch their vids.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Children watch a ton of YouTube videos. So sadly, all the most annoying stuff exists because it works to get them to click...

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Kamala posted sections of the full video, of course showing the bad comments from Vance. Trump posted only once section, but says watch the full video, while claiming all Kamala and her team do is lie. I'm actually trying to find the full speech and can't. Pretty annoying since you know Trumpers will say Kamala is lying

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

they even quote the shit and it into the comments, even though it has captions LOL

[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago

Vance said he doesn’t like the idea of his own kids going to a school with hardened security, “but that’s increasingly the reality that we live in.”

Only in America. Weird that 'reality' ignores all other first world nations.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

all other

Are you trying to imply the US is a first world country? /s

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

The definition of a first world country includes being a "stable democracy".

If you ask Americans how likely they believe attempts at election fraud will happen in the 2024 election I would be shocked if less than 80% said "very likely". That is not a stable democracy.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

If you ask Americans how likely they believe attempts at election fraud will happen in the 2024 election I would be shocked if less than 80% said “very likely”. That is not a stable democracy.

to be clear, most of the people that are going to say that are insane MAGA people that think biden is going to try and steal it...

The rest are non trumpers who think trump is going to steal it so...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

His kids are not in public school or in any sort of danger from a school shooter. Else he'd actually do something about it

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

In the US the oligarchs worry about models of profitability like keeping wages dirt low, profits sky high and workers at each other's throats rather than proven models of success like universal health care and sensible gun control employed by Europe and first world countries worldwide..

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children they’re not able.”

The psychos are the students! What school is gonna prevent a student from walking in? If you are intended to be inside the building there will never be enough security to keep killers out when the killer is already in the building. They would have to start cavity searching students because if they want to shoot up the school they would find a way.

The only solution is LESS guns available!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Cavity searching the students is genuinely their recommendation.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Well. The problem students. You know the ones.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The ones with Republican parents?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

“But if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools. We’ve got to bolster security so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children they’re not able.”

I guess no one remembers the fire alarm fiasco... March 24, 1998

https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/westside-school-shooting-3717/

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

https://theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-regularly-happens/

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Does the J.D. stand for Jackass Dickhead?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Jorgen Depeanus Vance.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Jabroni Defined

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Justthebiggest Dickhead

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

“People get shot at, look at Donny! Fuck I love this country!”

Delivered behind bullet proof glass with an armed team of mercenaries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

he's already said, "we have to get over it." how is that so much worse than "it's a fact of life." ?

they're both fucking ghouls who cheer on the arms industries whether they're tearing through Palestine or american schools, really what's the difference?

edit: to clarify, I mean what's the difference between these two statements - why all the amplified outrage now?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Gee one of them is a damned Nazi and the other is only(relative to fucking Nazis) a wall st leech.

One of them is So. Much. Worse. as to invalidate any comparisons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Once again, a maga/Republican is in trouble for saying out loud what they all believe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Do you think Trump's "October surprise" is going to be him swapping out VP candidates?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Election rules don't allow that in at least some places. Not sure how many.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

past a certain point you're locked in for candidacy, RFK is already experiencing this issue himself, and republicans, predictably, and wrong about it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

RFK just won an ruling that kept absentee ballots from getting sent out in North Carolina because his name is on the ballots, so now the voting can't start until the courts get everything worked out and all the ballots get reprinted if he wins the appeal.

People are literally being kept from voting right now because of him, and that benefits Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yet, somehow trump would be able to get away with it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, at least part of what he said isn't technically wrong.... School shootings are a "fact of life" in America.

And honestly, if we're not going to address the actual issue, which is guns at a national level, I wouldn't mind seeing every single school turned into a miniature 1980s Beirut.

Why not? Let's assign a Meal Team Six to every school. We'll get snipers on the roof, and random strip searches going on in K-12 education.

Maybe we can empower groups of students within each school to be miniature deputies who are tasked with keeping order among the other inmates, I mean students. We can call this the trustee program.

Oh, and by I wouldn't mind, I mean I would be horrified and it would traumatize at least an entire generation of children before the program was scrapped, but if we're already on this death drive and refuse to do anything meaningful, a part of me wants to see just how dumb we can really get.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This guy is getting canned. Any day now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

His cultists are locked in they don't hear this stuff and if they did they don't care. Sad state of affairs

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Trump's "if it makes us look bad it's a lie!"

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And if I did mean it, you deserved it.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Rest of the world: are they?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

But don't they want to make America great again and bring it to a place back in time when there were no school shootings because everything was so great? I thought that was their whole platform?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

JD Vance's next speech

“Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks.”

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Next thing you know Vance will be pushing legislation requiring that every public school classroom have an AR-15 in it, and every teacher be required to regularly pass a test demonstrating proficiency with it…

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Project 2025, page 357

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Helluva a pick there, donnie. Seems that the couch-fucker being very very weird only reflects on how weird you are.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
383 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18853 readers
4409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS