Well, he’s not a king or a wizard. It takes the whole government to get it done, and these were done under his administration.
Zachariah
Sounds like going with Option 1 to me. Too boring for America though.
Just because there are other options worth trying, doesn’t mean we should give up on also trying a peaceful option. If we elect better people, it’s not the same thing. If we strike, too, it’s not the same thing. Nonviolent interference is not doing the same thing. We can augment rather than abandon. It’s more complicated, harder, and requires cunning and patience rather than mere brute force. Nothing has a guaranteed result, not even violence—especially with GOP/MAGA in power. All of the tools are more effective when not under Republican rule.
Could be better. Could be worse. Still think it’s worth trying in addition to anything else we try.
Yeah, but I was responding to (what I thought was) the claim that the federal government would shut down its channel. I misread it. After further explanation and rereading I now see my error. I thought that’s what I said.
I interpreted you putting those words in her mouth as you saying she’s as right wing as the other side.
That doesn’t rule out holding them accountable via a government that works for us. Having that (or working towards that) was too boring for Americans this time. But if we had that, I’m sure the rich would be at least as scared of government guns as you say they’d be of increased vigilante guns.
“I’m so right wing…”
Let’s get it started in here!