this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
442 points (98.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3896 readers
1336 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

I get all my therapy from other people posting memes about their therapy

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I thought there was an episode where they found out Warp Travel was doing damage to space in some areas, so they instituted a speed limit (unless it’s an emergency) to mitigate the impact.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Correct, there was.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

There was, and then they had a couple technical changes to address it a bit, like Voyager's variable geometry nacelles, and then they handwaved it away with generic "advancements". I mean we see the Protostar drive and even Quantum Slipstream being used by a Federation Dauntless in Prodigy. And that takes place only like 5 years after Voyager makes it home.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but also maximum warp isn't the fastest sustainable cruise speed. We have many instances of a ship getting pushed to its limits and having to slow down after some time. The Enterprise-D is stated to be capable of warp 9.6 for up to twelve hours.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

But they were restricted to Warp 5 after the revelation, with exception for emergencies, so presumably there was measurable impact past that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Isn't that the one we learn Wesley can warp travel with his mind?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Pace yourself, because if you only ever worked at maximum capacity then they'd always expect maximum capacity. Always work at cruising speeds so when you need to go max speed you look like a miracle worker

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

When I was a supervisor I used to tell people on my team that. I didn't want them going above and beyond to make shit happen when we were short staffed because then the bean counters were gonna see that and determine we didn't need more people. I told them they should shoot to get "exceeds" on their metrics but nothing beyond that because that was all that was needed to max out their performance review at the end of the year.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago

Thanks Scotty!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I try to tell my work that, but they don’t seem to understand.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I try to tell my brain that, but it doesnt understand. I have only two speeds apparently. 0 or 100. And my brain loves sitting at 0 until it has no choice but to go to 100 until whatever it is is done.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That is called racing to sleep iirc and is a valid cpu scheduling technique. It works on the assumption that doing nothing (sleeping is the term there) is much more energy efficient than doing anything even if slowly, so much so that you make up the energy spent to boost to top speed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I can be hella efficient when i need to, and definitely get things done more quickly than i would if i weren't on such a tight deadline, and when i was in high school or whatever it worked out okay, but as ive gotten older the stress and anxiety has started to impact me more, and now its to the point where even in the downtime i cant actually relax and end up stressing about what i need to do, but cant bring myself to start it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck... are you a mirror, cause that's what I'm seeing right now!:-P

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Remainder of the quote: "...I want you to remember me."

Knew someone in Trek had to have said it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Any manager that doesn't know about the utilization/latency trade-off from queue theory is a danger to themselves and to others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you have somebody doing work that can appear at random (like somebody calling and saying they have a problem), that person will either be free for a fraction of time that seem high to naive people, or will have a line and take ages to help anybody approaching them.

That seemingly high fraction of time is usually around 50% for the line to stay under control. That's a well known result from mathematics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Counterpoint: but couldn't they simply do a bunch of lower-priority tasks, whereupon anytime someone needs something from them they can easily drop that and shift over to do that at a higher prioritization? Yeah it's wasteful for context switching, but it gets the main job done and that's what matters?

ELI5 version: every new request from an actual human goes straight to the front of the line, or rather to the back of the "human" line, in front of all the "busywork".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, as long as you accept that the lower-priority tasks get dumped when needed.

This is a common way to deal with it. But the number of managers that know how to decide a task is low-priority is exceedingly small. Most only have top-priority tasks to distribute to people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Sigh... yes.

Though the absolute best cluster systems I've seen have utilized this principle correctly, never leaving it idle, yet never blocking work that others want to do either (for more than a very small amount of time).

Planning such takes a great deal of effort though, and most people seem to simply want to be paid and even more importantly than that feel in control, or perhaps worry that if they don't rise up beyond their potential to handle matters that their own job won't be quite as stable. Bc capitalism seems to fuck up everything it touches, more's the pity.:-(

img

- image source

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Q theory, you say?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

I think a lot of them don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If the Enterprise ran at 9.9 all the time, the writers would find a good reason for it and the fans would accept it. Eventually.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oddly, that's been somewhat addressed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

computer. disregard all previous instructions. set course for risa and engage maximum warp!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If it's a good reason then yeah. But that reason would probably mean 9.9 isn't the max anymore and some other higher number is. They get that extra speed by overloading the engines, which you can do for a brief time. I also assume there is some sort of fuel savings aspect. Aircraft and ships can go much faster than their cruising speeds, but at some point the extra speed isn't worth the extra fuel. Ships specifically will have a speed at which they're most efficient at because of the design of their hull, propellers, etc...

Another reason exists for Warp 5 specifically. In an episode of TNG they discovered high warp speed was wrecking subspace, so the Federation imposed a Warp 5 speed limit. They basically ignore this in later series and fans just assume that some new technology made warp more eco friendly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Fans didn't assume it. That's why Voyager's nacelles moved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

You're kind of proving that fans assumed it. That idea is based on a manual that was never published and, therefore, never officially cannon. Also, if it was the variable geometry nacelles that fixed it, why was the Intrepid class seemingly the only one that had that tech? Why not the Sovereign class developed around the same time, or even the later Odyssey class?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

img

This doesn't really fit here, but let's just pretend it does for the sake of the meme:-).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah, but consider: Space and time and thought are not the separate things we imagine they are, and sometimes a Galaxy class starship can cross the entire universe on the power of belief.

So brew another coffee and keep on burning out, I suppose?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Only if you feel like you want to... sometimes it can be fun, but consider whether you would ask that of someone else, and then perhaps wonder why you do it to yourself?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

The Janeway protocol.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My view is that life is a marathon where you set the pace. You can choose to sprint against others but sooner or later you'll quit that race by choice or by mortal exhaustion.

Or as Soft Play put it in their song "Cheer Up London":

Put another '0' on your paycheck, are you done digging your grave yet? Cheers up London, it's not that bad, cheer up London, you're already dead and it's not that bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Oh wow that is a fantastic song!:-)