this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
184 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37662 readers
545 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

@hedge BTW: There is an update to the terms of service as well that implies that you cannot opt out of providing training data to their AI.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Well it's "allegedly" decentralized, which should solve this by design...

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 hours ago

Anyone who still uses Twitter either condones what Musk has done and is doing, or is completely oblivious.

I long for the day it dies the death it deserves and Musk is left holding the bag having to pay all the debt. If only he’d be forced to do that, but like all rich assholes, he’ll get out of it somehow.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

“One of the biggest functions of blocking is giving women the ability to stop weird men from constantly making them uncomfortable and scared,” one user wrote. “So of course Elon had to change that.”

Given how he constantly tries to insert himself and his opinions into everything he sees, it's clear he has no idea about how consent works, nor why people don't want him in their lives.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 hours ago

Consent doesn't matter to rich people. It's not exclusive to Musk.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly don't think it's a matter of him not understanding how consent works and more of a matter that he sees consent as something that gets in his way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Or maybe just refuses to fathom that other people could not want to talk to him. If he has a psych file I'm sure it's darkly fascinating.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Rather people have no idea how blocking on 𝕏 worked/works. You were ALWAYS able to see tweets from people that blocked you by simply logging out or using an alt account.

I don’t understand all this fuss about this simple change. He only removes a useless feature that was never more than a minor inconvenience for those that got blocked.

If you don’t want people to see your tweets, lock your profile. This worked before and this still works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You were ALWAYS able to see tweets from people that blocked you by simply logging out or using an alt account.

Well, yeah. It's a different account. That's how accounts work. Do you think one account blocking someone should result in every account blocking them too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Having a public (i.e. not locked) Twit𝕏 account and believing you can block single people is a bit stupid to begin with.

When screaming on a market square, you can’t demand for single people to “please not listen” to what you’re screaming.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

When I block someone I do not care if they see what I post. I just do not want them to be able to interact with it. I don't want to see them. I don't want their opinion. But it's fine if they want to spend their energy fuming about whatever I post. Or more likely, simply who I am.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Locking your front door won't keep someone out who really wants to get in.

Is that stupid, too?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Of course, not. But closing and locking the door doesn’t prevent the person on the other side to still listen in on your conversations…

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, I don't use Twitter. So that's all you.
But blocking accounts have been a thing for decades. It's not a new concept.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

In closed systems like messengers, where you don’t see any content unless logged in, yes. There, it works brilliantly. But on Twitter, this is like cutting out something from a newspaper when there’s a news stand right next door.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Twitter has DMs, plus it helps by not allowing that person to reply unless they create a new account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

And it’s exactly like this now, if I understand the change correctly. They only removed the “you can’t see this post because the owner limits who can see it” thing. Blocked people still can’t reply.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize it's the same thing here, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Yep, that’s why I don’t get all this panicking about the Twitter change…

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago

simply logging out or using an alt account

It is increasingly difficult to use X without an account. Not sure what the signup process is like nowadays. IIRC it used to require phone number verification in the Twitter days, but perhaps Musk relaxed the requirements in order to better pad the usage stats with spambots?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago

or, even better: delete twitter altogether

[–] [email protected] 119 points 14 hours ago

“One of the biggest functions of blocking is giving women the ability to stop weird men from constantly making them uncomfortable and scared,” one user wrote. “So of course Elon had to change that.”

They buried the lede a bit there, but that's pretty much it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

changing how its “block” button works. That option previously allowed users to hide their profile from certain accounts – but will no longer do so.

So I guess all that stuff they did to lock down the ability to see things on Xitter without an account was strictly for evil then

[–] [email protected] 93 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Hope some of them go to Mastadon.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Does Mastodon have the blocking features that Bluesky has (like lists, blocks stopping quote reply chains, etc)?

Other than on Blahaj, I’ve never found a place more chill to be queer online once you apply a couple of well maintained block lists.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If you need the feature set of Bluesky and can’t use Mastodon, please also follow https://fed.brid.gy/ if you can. This will allow Mastodon users to follow you from the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

As far as I'm aware, Mastodon blocks work the same way they'll work on Twitter now - The person you blocked can see your posts, but can't interact with you

Edit: Actually, I was wrong the person you blocked can't see your posts on Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 36 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I know Imani Gandy is now posting on mastodon. She had an enormous following on Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it really actually only takes a couple of big users moving to Mastodon to cause a domino effect of a mass migration. I hope more people with tons of followers start moving over.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The problem is that people won’t move until their audience there and their audience won’t move until they are there.

And mastodon is a bit less straightforward compared to old Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Mastodon is also somewhat hostile towards new users. Significant swaths of it treat this shared public network as a small private chatroom, and get cranky when September stretches on too long.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Of course this is anecdotal but I haven’t seen that - most of the disdain I’ve seen is towards new instance admins who don’t take proper steps to moderate stuff or prevent spammy signups.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yeah, but some people are more willing to move onto a smaller platform. Like us. In practice, as long as more than one person becomes willing per person who makes the change, it works out to compounding percentage growth, which is good because the internet itself would never have taken off otherwise (or cities and railways, for that matter).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If they don’t, please also follow https://fed.brid.gy/ so your BlueSky account is federated to Mastodon. If you move to Threads, please turn on Fediverse integration.

It’s so frustrating, between Mastodon, Bluesky and Threads almost every person I used to follow on Twitter exists somewhere else. But only about half of them are accessible in any one platform.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

IOCX has a noticeable increase in new user signups since a day or two back.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

who knew that removing the block feature and "Twitter's new ToS says all disputes will be heard in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas located in Tarrant County (Tesla investor Reed O'Connor's court)" were not going to be winners among the remaining userbase

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago

Definitely not mr boy "genius" elon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

@alyaza @hedge Funny side note: This rule with the disputes is not valid for residents of the EU due to their regulations. There an Irish court is responsible.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 14 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

oh yah nostr still exists.

i stopped using it when all of my shitcoin filters did nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

oh it’s getting good

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

Nazi central.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

ActivityPub ye!