this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
289 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4848 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You know what, we can do that too:

"They're saying Trump is sleeping with Laura Loomer. She's controlling him. He's an old piece of shit that is easily manipulated and controlled by a crazy woman willing to give him some sadvag. People are saying this."

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've read this on the internet so I believe it to be true

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now I've seen someone read that comment out on TV, so therefore it must be true!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also his rally crowd sizes are very small. Very.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We have small crowds, very small crowds. The smallest of all crowds. Sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We used to have huge crowds, I've been there. I've campaigned with them. Huge crowds. We filled the National Mall. Millions of people. You should have seen them. I've spoken to them. Now, they're all gone. Where are they, I don't know. They were huge. Now they're so small. You should see them now. Wow. What a small crowd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The crowds come in, the crowds go out, you can't explain it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

You know, I've also heard people saying this. Many people are saying this.

Who specifically? Oh, I can't recall.

But lots of people are saying this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I also heard this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, word is on the street Laura and Don are a couple. Hell I think I might have heard some people talking about it at the bar. Melania must be pissed 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He sounds like me accusing people of hacking because I lost in a game.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But he won, remember?

The enemy is both weak and strong.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In Trump land, the accusation is always an admission.

This asshole was probably wearing 3 wires, but he bought them off Temu, and they shorted out after she shook his hand.

Motherfucker was a sweaty mess after that power move.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Conservative debate has basically devolved into "But, can you tell me what a woman is?". Trump could have a team of the best conservative debaters in his ear and he'd do just about as well.

Also doesn't help that he doesn't listen to jack shit so he'd likely rip out the headphone for being annoying.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's actually not just wires - credible reports say he used a different kind of device

It's well known that Donald Trump was using a bluetooth butt plug during the debate [...]

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The real scoop is that Trump himself wore a bluetooth communication device throughout the debate - the tell tale signs of subtle vibrations have been confirmed by independent experts - I've seen talk of this before on Lemmy but it seems like MSM have been suppressing this story... yet another case of conservative bias.

It's been credibly pointed out elsewhere that Trump pulled a Hans Neimann

It's well known that Donald Trump was using a bluetooth butt plug during the debate [...]

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This would be a good rumor to spread except that everyone knows he doesn't have the rectal control to hold in a butt plug.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

That's why he's got a diaper on. Helps keep it in place and catches it if it slips out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's why he had that face the whole time

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is it Morse code or just the 1 for no, 2 for yes kind of thing?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Can you imagine Donny Diapers learning Morse code? I'm surprised he can even read at a 3rd grade level.

Anyway, it's probably more like one buzz for "calm the fuck down" and two for "no, seriously CALM THE FUCK DOWN!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Morse code - it's how people talked when Trump was growing up afterall.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I thought it was smoke signals

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He grew up? I thought he just got old.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

BZZZZZ. BZZZZZ.

Tell him to change the subject from people eating pets!

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!

"I'm trying but he won't stop!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He kept nodding his head during the debate like he was agreeing with Harris.

My thought was he was listening to a coach in his ear.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Ass, a coach in his ass. He borrowed the tech from Hans Neimann.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol at someone backstage telling him "OK now attack her race. That's great, great now immediately stop talking about the economy and mention how Haitians are eating dogs! And cats too. Perfect!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

JD Vance stole the mic and was running away from the people who originally had it, they were 5 percent less stupid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

You can't prove he didn't have a Bluetooth powered butt plug on the whole time

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

It really does suck when you're in a debate and the other person defuses all your points with facts. It would have been far nicer if the other person looked stupid. If they don't actually know anything, like myself, that's also kinda dishonest to just have those facts. Especially when it's a debate in the election, which is really a game show on TV, and not about real politics. Shameful behavior

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This cracks me up because he did not lose so much because of her outstanding performance as much as his aweful one.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She did perform great, but honestly I'd say a large part of that would be her reactions in the side-by-side while he spoke. There's not way someone could have told her through an ear-piece how to react quickly enough for that. It's just a really stupid lie, but that's pretty normal for this gross weird old man.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I disagree again that she performed great. She was fine and certainly great by any modern us political standards. but I mean all she had to do was mention he rallies and he lost all composure.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I won the debate, but the only reason I lost was she cheated!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But Trump told me he WON so why would that Matter?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“My opponents are simultaneously bumbling fools and criminal masterminds!”

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  1. The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”

Umberto Eco Makes a List of the 14 Common Features of Fascism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Umberto Eco is my literary crush

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So I guess that means Trump must have had a secret earpiece. Or maybe a vibrating butt plug.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They tried that but Trump is so incontinent it kept falling into his dirty diaper.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

I had no reason to think that Trump had wore an earpiece but now I'm completely convinced he did

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Kinda sounds like he thinks Kamala did unbelievably well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Poor little orange turd. He is having some tough days. Today is a good day to retire.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's what the loser of the debate would say. But Trump says he was the clear winner of the debate, so I'm confused.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Even if it were true, its like the dumb concept of no calculators allowed on math tests. In real world practice she can and should get all the help from experts she can.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Until these headlines say "Trump lies about..." the publication is complicit. Get fucked Forbes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

the earrings sent messages to his brain forcing trump to repeat all the bullshit he saw on TV

load more comments
view more: next ›