Sorry, im mixed up in several posts specifically about barring third parties from running. This one is just criticism.

Its hilarious the upvotes im getting missing the point. There is no presidential election next year.

Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.

Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you're claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you've seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.

Such candidates are available, youre arguing they shouldnt be allowed to run because theyll spoil the party that benefits tremendously from first past the post.

Yeah i bet she wont even try to get elected next year

Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please

You vote exclusively for candidates that actively support and benefit from first past the post, and are fighting against a candidate that actively supports getting rid of it. You cant claim to want to get rid of it

Oh plenty of other people are having the same issues of republicans and democrats kicking them off the ballots

This is insane. Youre demanding they win more elections but also demand they dont run because theyre spoilers, despite supporting their policies? Gee I wonder why theyre having a hard time getting elected.

Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid

Thinking not winning is proof someone doesnt intend to win is ridiculous