this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11047 readers
3242 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck this carving looks absolutely beautiful

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You too, huh? Something about it speaks to me. The simplicity, clean lines, dunno?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I think it’s something about the skill needed to make this and the fact that no machines were involved. It’s quite something though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Modernist art deco, like it was made in the 1930s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That the Sumerian’s will use anything but metric.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If I remember correctly, Homo sapiens sapiens was not only coetaneous with Mammoths, but we are widely considered to be one, if not the main cause of their extintion.

Also constructions like Gobekli tepe, with it's carvings and decorations, predate the extintion of Mammoths by something like 6000 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I... am so disappointed this didn't go where, for a split second, my brain thought it was going.

Homo sapiens sapiens was not only coetaneous with Mammoths, but we are widely considered to be one

Chickens are dinosaurs - and humans are mammoths!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Birds are dinosaurs. Humans are not mammoths

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Don't tell me what I am and am not

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

birds are the continuation of the theropod dinosaur lineage.

humans are the continuation of the early synapsid lineage also present at the time (which later gave rise to the early mammal progenitor).

when people say birds are dinosaurs they mean the lineage didn't branch as much as it did for humans, which I think is more survivorship bias than anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People say birds are dinosaurs because every living thing is in every clade of it's ancestors which means they are dinosaurs. They're also a lot of other things from all of the other clades so they're not saying that birds are just dinosaurs, but that they are part of Dinosauria and every other clade of their ancestors and so too will all of their descendants be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yes, one could say birds have skeletons in the same manner. I guess I'm just trying to understand what the opposing position before was the great revelation birds are dinosaurs was uttered. I'm perpetually confused by this expression.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Just using some tiny mammoth population on an isolated island in Siberia to state "MAMMOTHS WERE STILL ROAMING THE EARTH WHEN BLAH BLAH BLAH" is somewhat disingenuous.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Roaming the earth means roaming all - or at least a very significant portion of - the earth, not some very isolated region. So I would say yes - if some tiny population of mammoths was still alive in some limited area at this time, they were not 'roaming the earth'.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Also pretending that 4000 years ago humans were still hunter gatherers or something (it's kind of implied in the wording imo). 4000 years ago there were plenty of fairly developed civilisations around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weren't there like full blown civilizations at that point? Kinda weird to refer to mammoths as if it were some stone age prehistoric period and be surprised that someone could craft something like this then lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the pyramids at Giza were a few millennia old at that point eh?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Not millennia, but several centuries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Locusts ARE grasshoppers. If enough grasshoppers group up in the same area they literally become locusts and fuck everything up.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locust

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but a locus is a type of grasshopper.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

grasshopper are light thin and green. that is easily double the mass, chonky, and looks like it's ready swarm downtown LAPD

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Hematite = best tite

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The eyes don't make sense to me. How did they know to use this pattern? Are there some really big grasshoppers out there?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No doubt there are insects big enough to be able to see the patterns on the eyes without magnification.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  1. Exactly this. Just eyesight & time.
  2. Not to mention that some insects even have a bit of contrast between the lenses so it's easier to understand they are compounded.
  3. And additionally due to individual lenses compounded eyes arent smooth - by reflecting light at different angles you can make the "bumps" obvious.
  4. Also if there is like a water droplet on grasshoppers eyes you can clearly see it's surface structure. Just like you can see individual pixels on your (high dpi phone?) screen the same way.

Tho I bet they didn't study this ones eyes:

It's called a fairy wasp (wiki/Megaphragma_mymaripenne) and it's only the third smallest insect known.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'm sure they had plenty of experience with bugs in their environment, both alive and dead. I'm sure you can see the eyes pretty well close up.