144
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

This is yet another reason we need President Harris.

Trump will let Google get away with it.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

What we really need is President Biden. This is all happening thanks to him. There's some hope that Harris would continue his policies if elected, but there are strong rumours that some donors are supporting her with the agreement that if she wins she gets rid of Lina Khan.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

Yes please. Google has become a monster.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

Breakup Divesting the Android operating system, used on about 2.5 billion devices worldwide, is one of the remedies that’s been most frequently discussed by Justice Department attorneys, according to the people. In his decision, Mehta found that Google requires device makers to sign agreements to gain access to its apps like Gmail and the Google Play Store.

It would be wonderful

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the Justice Department pushes ahead with a breakup plan, the most likely units for divestment are the Android operating system and Google’s web browser Chrome

Hell yes. If Android is divested from Google, that would significantly reduce Google's attempts to lock down the OS, and would probably make alternative app stores more popular as the Play Store becomes just one of many options for manufacturers that would no longer be required to provide it on all Android devices.

And as for Chrome, about damn time. A browser with that much marketshare shouldn't also be owned by the largest search engine and ad network. That's just a recipe for monopolizing internet standards and access.

Another option would require Google to divest or license its data to rivals, such as Microsoft’s Bing or DuckDuckGo

More competition in the search engine space? Sign me up. Google has too much control over the quality of search results simply due to their size.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Please.

Stop.

I can only get so erect! (And the headline alone already did a lot)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I am curious how either unit would earn revenue as an independent company.

Will Android get to keep the Play Store? Does that include media? Do they charge Google to distribute the Maps app?

Will Google pay Chrome to stay the default search engine? Maybe Chrome can charge schools and libraries for ChromeOS updates?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Break them up. and then don't let them slowly re-consolidate in the following 20 years.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

ISPs/Telecom too!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

If this goes through, every big tech company could be in the crosshairs.

I'm all for it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Way too rare, if you ask me.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'll believe it if I ever live to see it.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Bloomberg - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Bloomberg:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-13/doj-considers-seeking-google-goog-breakup-after-major-antitrust-win
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Good bot. Fuck the haters.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)

News

22896 readers
3939 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS