The United States government in this case, as they are bound by the law.
I’ll give you a quick ELI5, Iran will run roughshot over the middle east if there isn’t someone there to keep them inline. Israel is that someone.
Israel has nuclear weapons and can defend themselves just fine with the conventional weapons they already possess. They do not need our assistance in committing genocide.
I'll repeat the question you completely ignored in favor condescension and flimsy excuses for genocide:
How does that exempt us from the Leahy Law?
You can also scroll up:
I’ll leave you and the straw caricature you’ve constructed of me to talk things out.
My first reaction to the article wasn't "Whatabout Hamas, huh?!"
Is that why you're whatabouting for him?
You celebrate bad faith in government when it's in favor of genocide.
You're no different than Trumpers who rejoiced that the system "works" when SCOTUS overturned Roe.
The result was that State could not find a legal reason not to supply.
Yeah, imagine that. Someone from the Biden administration pretending not to see the obvious.
So the Intercept is triggering you with this death
Just ignore it if it makes Netanyahu look bad!
You were whining that the intercept isn't running articles you would prefer to see and instead running articles you don't want anyone to ever know about.
Then why whatabout?
I don't want the United States to ignore the Leahy Law in order to sell weapons that Netanyahu will use to commit genocide.