377
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago

I mean, he is too old. He's only 3 years younger than Biden. So if the narrative here is that Biden is too old, then so is Trump.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

That three years makes a big difference to Trump voters, that is the difference between "Frowned Upon" and 18 years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

He is only the candidate because of DEI. It would be discrimination to disqualify him based on his advanced age. Damn DEI.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] [email protected] 75 points 1 month ago

Wait wait, the Democrats, who said Biden was too old and stopped giving $ to Biden's campaign are being consistent in their message? Well I'll be damned.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

How dare you hold republicans to even the most meager standards!

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] [email protected] 70 points 1 month ago

Its not his age it's that his brain is broken.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

His brain is even more broken than before. Watch the footage of MAGAts walking out of his rallies as he keeps repeating the same things and talking gibberish.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

And not just normal age related broken. Though age hasn't really improved the situation.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

He abuses Adderall which would explain his cognitive decline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 69 points 2 months ago

I mean we've been saying they are both too old. That hasn't changed.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Unless the democrats fuck up and pick someone over 70, it's a good win for them on this point.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I think everyone who had their name pushed and could have a chance at the convention has already endorsed Kamala Harris. They're pretty obviously trying to avoid a contentious convention.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

Dementia Don, the racist rapist with 34 felonies that can't complete a coherent sentence is too old. He needs to drop out, it's just embarrassing at this point.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

The Fanta Menace. I'm dying on this hill.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The Tangerine Palpatine is simply too old to lead the galactic senate and needs to step down to the nursing home.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Is it just me, or has Newsweek been putting out a lot of content about how Trump is losing and doing poorly, despite most polls saying otherwise?

Beware this source. It's one step away from a tabloid.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

It provides a false sense of security for the left even though they should still definitely be worried. The past week is reminiscent of 2016 when everyone thought Trump was a joke candidate and Hillary was going to crush him.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

That's one thing to remember, troll factories don't just shove out the same piece of propaganda. They try disenfranchise, disinterest, and even guide the people they don't want to win towards candidates and policies they know will play into their hands. Kamala Harris is certainly a good candidate - for democrats. She's not likely to influence Trumpers, and a more traditional candidate might have been more popular with anyone who really was undecided. A better option might have been to appeal to times when politics wasn't as divided, and I have even joked that someone like John Kerry with Mitt Romney as VP would have been a sure win.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Turnabout is fair play~

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Reminder that he shits his adult diapers daily

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

He's always been too old. Biden dropping out is just his core from dating it because they at least understand the concept of "don't throw stones in glass house." Meanwhile conservatives only speak two languages - hypocrisy and fanaticism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

He is too old, but like, if a 90 year old hitler were running for president i wouldnt be saying im not voting for him because of his age. Trump has been the worst parts of humanity for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

The fascists are pikachu facing that people are fine voting for another democratic candidate after one day because they cant fathom losing their strong man candidate. In their world Dems losing Biden = loss of voters because if Trump somehow stopped running literally no one would turn out for the GOP ticket. Lesson is: one party is based on a vague platform, the other is based on a lunatic personality cult.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Just look at that turkey gobbler! That is a sure signs of someone who is too old!

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

He confused Biden and Obama, Haley and Pelosi. Bizarre stuff spews from his mouth nearly every time he opens it. Where's the outrage?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

if you aint fit for working after 65+, you shouldnt be fit to be a fucking president

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A single felony conviction prevents you from getting a TON of jobs...

... but apparently 34 doesn't prevent you from being president

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

This really demonstrates a difference between democrats and republicans.

Democrats cared about the hypocrisy of pointing out that the opponent candidate was too old, and only started saying this after this was no longer a problem.

Republicans didn’t care that their candidate was also too old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Jesus Fred Christ what are the photo editors doing?

Every trump article has an ever-more-close-up even-greasier horror picture of his sociopathic rapist fraud face. Man, nobody wants to see that shit!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Exactly what they should be IMO. It's an article talking about how he is too old and that photo, even from the tiny thumbnail I see, is just perfect for demonstrating that fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
377 points (96.5% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3458 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS