The USSR collapsed 
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
193 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15681 readers
225 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Unironically yes. The pressure of having a communist super power made governments and companies in the capitalist west pretend to care about workers. Once that pressure went off, companies started to keep all the surplus they could.
I'm not so sure. Maybe in Soviet-adjacent governments this was a factor, but the US started its neoliberal turn in the 70s, when people were still operating under the assumption that the USSR would never collapse.
They did that due to internal factors though, to break out of stagflation
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I’ve only ever heard this asserted without evidence, and am becoming suspicious of it. Will China’s current rise really compel the bourgeoisie to cede concessions the proletariat?
No China will not do anything lol. They’re looking to “increase productive forces.” There’s legitimacy to it, of course, but how long will this goal take? Who knows. All we know is that China wants your business regardless of ideology, and it has no desire to impose its ideology on anyone else. A country can go through 500 coups of various ideologies and China will be there and say “there must be respect for sovereignty, peace, and trade cooperation.”
The threat of China is one of business and military. Ideology is just a boogeyman to get people riled up. There is no reason for concessions and there hasn’t been any for decades now. The average American recognizes his suffering, but he tells himself to keep on truckin’ because he believes his treats are cheap and readily accessible and the Asians are still living in rural huts. The only thing that will compel the bourgeoisie to give concessions is if the west decouples from not just China, but a lot of outsourcing, and industry comes back domestically.
The fall of the USSR saw inequality rise globally. That is no coincidence. Perhaps it was already rising, but its collapse sped it up significantly. It’s also not a coincidence that some of the bloodiest labor and civil rights moments occurred when we still produced stuff. Of course other factors were in play, but I’m just saying. We haven’t seen a single Pinkerton shot in a very long time.
USSR gave logistics, financial and military support to leftist groups wherever they need. China would ask those leftist groups to first get into power before sitting on the table with them.
[China] has no desire to impose its ideology on anyone else
load more comments
(5 replies)
The average westerner believes they have a higher quality of life than the average Chinese citizen, but that's slowly changing I think. I think the propaganda is getting more tenuous and more difficult to maintain by western countries. It's becoming blatantly obvious how developed China is.
Also the USSR's threats were things like military defectors and brain drain. I haven't heard of any high profile instances of spies defecting to China or selling state secrets or whatever. If that started happening, I could maybe believe there's enough discontent among western proletariat to do something like demand concessions.
The CIA’s entire network in China was exposed a few years ago and all of their agents were executed or imprisoned. This was done by a supposed mole in the CIA. He confessed to everything, but the CIA had no evidence against him. He was convicted anyway.
Brain drain is slowly happening. After the racist investigations against Chinese/Chinese American professors in the US that found no spies, China has been offering positions at Chinese universities and some people who joined said China offered more staff members and funding for research compared to the US. But again it’s not happening on an alarming scale.
All of these things are too niche for the average American to care about, so it doesn’t have any affect on public perception of china. Yet anyway.
load more comments
(4 replies)
The average westerner believes they have a higher quality of life than the average Chinese citizen, but that's slowly changing I think.
restaurants cost 2x what they did earlier in my lifetime, rent probably 3x. I remember learning about career options in highschool that essentially stopped existing less than a decade later. I'm not that old. How fast is slow suppose to be?
Racism is a powerful buffer to prevent anything good happening. Westerners need to go through a lot before admitting they're worse off than non-whites
load more comments
(5 replies)
China is not the same as the Soviet Union.
Much of China’s prosperity is deeply integrated with the global neoliberal free market and China was able to leverage its vast reserve of cheap labor (blessed by the United States wanting to export its own manufacturing base to crush its working class movements at home, back in the 1970s) to bring material gains to its people.
China’s achievement is in its socialist policies that put people at the center, rather than the capitalists or the free market, and this allowed them to lift millions upon millions of people out of poverty and set the nation on a course towards prosperity.
The Soviet Union, on the other hand, was a genuine alternative (or at least attempted) to the Western-led capitalist system. The Soviet Union was more or less a self-contained entity and largely self-sufficient, and did not rely on foreign export markets for economic development and growth. The workers in the Soviet Union enjoyed working conditions and social welfare that were on par with Western European social democracy, if not better.
Unfortunately the same cannot be said for China today - the working conditions, especially for the 300 million migrant workers in the coastal cities, are still distances behind what the Soviet Union was capable of achieving decades ago.
And this brings me to a central point I have been saying many times on this site: de-dollarization is truly the most important first step, the pre-requisite towards the formation of an alternative system that can challenge the US/Western-dominated neoliberal capitalism. The pervasiveness of the dollar regime throughout the world means that everyone is at risk of losing if the empire crumbles. China cannot just sit back and wait for the US to fail. It needs to pro-actively decouple itself before it is too late.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Certainly a take 
You know what, he makes a good point
Let's start by shuttering one of the biggest expenses to the government, the US military, in order to 'reduce socialism'
New Red Scare but for Fortune 500 CEOs doing government contracts this time 
Sitting senators asking Northrop Grumman executives if they're socialist because they take government handouts would at least be funny as fuck if nothing else
Socialism is when Lockheed Martin gets a $200 billion contract
Imperialism, the Highest Stage of ~~Capitalism~~ Socialism
"Socialism is when the government does stuff" but without a whiff of irony.
Me turning a giant dial that goes from 'capitalism' to 'socialism'
"Socialism is the post office and roads and capitalism is when I, John Capital, buy a riding lawnmower."
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'd say his brain is leaking out of his ears, but his skull has long since run dry
The metric of economic organization is just dollars then??
Bottom right image is the original version from an ad, but it looks so much worse than the edited one with them all holding knives.
I don't care what anyone says, the one with the knives is the original
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Witness the essential kernel of fascism unfold before you in real time.
I wouldn't even say "capitalism" straight up. A lot of this shit is the result of capitalism at least in so far as these are all WW2 veterans who got the Settler Colonial bump from a plundered American continent and a decimated European rival market.
This was a singular moment in time, during which American Fascism delivered the goods for its popular loyalist base. What changed was that the Fascists at the top of the system did what Fascists always do and began eating their own seed corn rather than share with subsequent generations. The empire turned inward, crushed the popular social democrats of the 50s/60s/70s, and consolidated their gains within the robbery barony strongholds of the modern finance system.
If you want this moment back, you need to... well... 
That means either doing a Socialism or a Barbarism. And we know what @creation247 thinks the answer is, but I doubt many folks in his audience are going to be excited about serving as cannon fodder in his next Glorious White Nationalist War. No more than the poor bastards shoved up into the front lines of the Russia-Ukraine war appear to be enjoying themselves, anyway.
Edit: Can I just say that Twitter, in its current incarnation, is slow and jenky af? Nothing fucking works on this website anymore.
Also FDR correctly saw that capitalism needed to be saved from itself and put a generation of administrators and politicians in position of power through the new deal to stave off the collapse, which it did, but then his head exploded and the erosion started back again (but with the working class effectively neutered then)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Post-WWII Burgerland really was a singular moment, which white boomers inherited and assumed was the normal, sustainable state of affairs. It’s impossible to Make America Great Again, and given that its greatness was through neoimperialism, it oughtn’t be.
Yup turns out being the only country with a significant manufacturing output when the rest of the world has to rebuild everything is pretty much an infinite money cheat code.
Which in typical boomer fashion the next generation totally learned from by exporting all of our manufacturing and transitioning us to an economy where you have to provide a service deemed valuable by the people who took all the money.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
$10,000 monthly pronoun bill
And I'm already having a hard time paying my gay fees which is especially hard now that I'm missing out on the slur dividend.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Political correctness is why I can't afford food 
I see chuds now pushing the line that the government is giving free/cheap housing to migrants and refugees, and THAT’S why you can’t afford a home.
Chuds will go for the most racist, smooth brained reasons before blaming capitalism.
The hard part about capitlaism is eventually you run out of other people's money
load more comments
(1 replies)
And it's always a Fight Club avatar, do they make these kinds of guy(s) in a lab or something? Literal NPCs.
Not surprising, it's the movie that literally coined the term "special snowflake."
Chuds want the old 1950s capitalism where only Black people and ’undeserving’ whites suffered.
The cost of everything went up
Why?
They printed more money
Why?
Government does stuff
Why?
Class warfare, warfare, money laundering, etc.
But entitlements?
Homelessness is a societal choice, private healthcare is the most expensive on earth, food waste, administrative costs of means based testing, policing poverty is expensive, corporations don't pay taxes, contrived tax code, no bid contracts, etc.
Which isn't even mentioning what a farce the premise that shit was good like that without it being more complicated. You know how a hamburger looks in an ad versus when you're actually eating it? It was also people benefitting from war profiteering, exploitation, slavery, and apartheid. Like how do you think the sweet old man baker got the sugar in the first place?
I keep seeing people in the replies to these citing moving away from the gold standard as the reason. Which further strengthens my belief that Libertarians are the only people who bought twitter blue-checks en masse.
Nostalgic to see some early 2000s crankery though.
Libertarians are interesting because they will list out all the problems of capitalism and then say the issue is not enough capitalism.
What changed? I'm surprised not much talk here about the obvious change in conservative right wing values since then.
In the past these white middle income men would be proud to provide for an entire family, they would happily accept the women stay at home, actually they would demand it and they wouldn't complain about them being gold diggers, in fact they would rejoice together as they bought the newest color TV or microwave.
In contrast the old "hard day at work" is far from being a conservative value and is deeply out of touch at least with millenials and younger chuds imo. They complain about the "softness" of liberals but it is all projection, as you know, they are literaly the most likely group to get scammed by get rich quick schemes. All the masculine alpha males/crypto bros are all looking for the next scam to become millionaires overnight because as the damn alphas they're obviously entitled to it.
The other part is modern right values end up contradicting old conservative values like in this case, the dream of a house and a stay at home mother is in conflict with the toxic masculinity chud cults that demonize women for trying to work, get education or leave the house therefore helping achieve this "American dream".
TL;DR even if somehow economic conditions improved the current all the cryptobro/alpha male generation isn't going back to single income households anytime soon, probably never as the hate for women reached a point where old conservative dreams like this is not actually desirable for many.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I want a version of this but with those Sino-Soviet friendship posters that look like they could be a couple.
: "We need to derooguloot! We can trust the heckin' wholesome corporashunz!"
: "Porky fucked us over?! Poor porky, seeing his fellow whites not get the special treatment they deserve must have hypnotized him into being corrupt! Time to derooguloot even mooor"
Fight Club is kinda a fun movie and you can read some interesting "deconstructing masculinity" vibes in it but fuck me if everyone that has a Tyler Durden avatar isn't waving a giant red chud flag.
Up there with American Psycho, Starship Troopers, and Taxi Driver as films that sketchy men with terrible media literacy love and take absolutely the wrong things from.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
view more: next ›