Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
Rules:
Merciful god, people will elect any moron if they have an R next to their name.
You need to know we’re 35+ years into this. The age of trump has proven what we’ve known ever since Reagan (arguably Nixon): Republican ideals are a sham, covering only racist, sexist, Christofascist power grabs. Anyone who votes R knowingly or unknowingly supports those things. And as a certified cult, they are both forbidden from voting differently and from questioning that fact.
All hail trump, only he alone can save them. Covfefe.
We've known conservative ideals have been garbage for a lot longer than that (all the way back to the founding of the country, in fact). Republican ideals being garbage more recently is simply a reflection of Republican party becoming more purely conservative since Nixon.
For Rs, being a moron is a selling point -- it makes The Base think they're "just like us."
What about any of this makes you think there's a merciful god?
Perhaps hell is real and this is it?
Not even knowing how to spell “principles” certainly tracks.
I mean, the joke almost literally writes itself
Which is a good thing since Santos clearly shouldn't write it
You name reads pretty close to Grammar-ton, so this works on a few levels.
Jesus, that's a hell of a smackdown coming from a ~~senator~~ house rep
Raskin is a rep and would actually have a tough time getting one of the MD Senator seats. We've got a lot of conservative areas and blue dogs and it would be much harder for him to win statewide vs just Montgomery county.
Ope, you're right. Got my legislative branches mixed up
(P.S. Dear mods, in case you think this violates the rule against replies based on spelling and grammar, I'd argue this has more to do with professionality than that)