For a long time, Telegram has acted as if it's above the law
What law? That the government can read and censor your private messages? Then good, and we should want it to stay that way!
For a long time, Telegram has acted as if it's above the law
What law? That the government can read and censor your private messages? Then good, and we should want it to stay that way!
Without a disclaimer that Telegram is a platform that anyone can use, and that is mainly used by non criminals, and policing speech in private chats is a really bad idea for privacy, it just seems like fearmongering to get people to hate Telegram, because obviously Facebook's WhatsApp is so much better.
Where does the comment say 'serious questions'? It wasn't edited.
Sorry, my bad! Edited
No, you see the world is ending because of God, not because of carbon emissions! And why worry about damaging the world when it's going to end soon anyway? /s
Great article, the fact that it was written by Albert Einstein shouldn't be proof of its truth but the words within it; otherwise it is just a fallacy of authority. But the contents itself should be enough to be proof of it's truth, apart from a few minor artifacts of the society of the time such as saying 'he' rather than 'they' when referring to a person.
Fair enough, there might well have been some scaly dinosaurs, but they weren't all scaly the way the image suggests.
Why? 2024-2001=21. That's definitely old enough to be online
Edit: 23, definitely old enough
I don't get it
Edit: what does this mean?
imgbb.com
bandwidth limit exceeded
That's just thought association, classical (pavlovian) conditioning is about a conditioned stimulus creating a learned response, not a thought, eg if you were to be shudder every time you heard 'Pavlov' because you thought of dogs.
Lemmy users hate AI for some reason, the luddites.