239
yeahh gay sex rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

For a long time, I've just assumed this was a weird way that my bipolar and my bisexuality interacted. Is this just a normal human thing?!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You may be abrosexual, of course; but that could also be an explanation.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm just curious, is this an actual thing?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

at least personally it's just like how you want variety in your food, which is part of why polygamy just seems objectively superior to me

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

do you mean polyamory? polygamy is where only the man gets to have multiple partners, and it usually comes with lots of abuse and misogyny. polyamory is sick tho, speaking from experience.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

not sure where you got that from, quote wikipedia:

"Polygamy (from Late Greek πολυγαμία polygamía, "state of marriage to many spouses")[1][2][3][4] is the practice of marrying multiple spouses. When a man is married to more than one wife at the same time, it is called polygyny. When a woman is married to more than one husband at the same time, it is called polyandry. In sociobiology and zoology, researchers use polygamy in a broad sense to mean any form of multiple mating."

But i did find the term "polyfidelity" which is very precise to what i want, "a type of non-monogamous, relationship in which all members are recognized as equivalent to the other partners and comply to restrict sexual and romantic relationship activities to exclusively only other members within the group. "

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean yeah, it means marriage to multiple people, which is illegal in most of the world. Polyamory is having multiple relationships.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

and marriage to multiple people is effectively what i want, i want as many partners as we can make work all "married" to each other.

Obviously it's not tremendously simple to manage, but that's the ideal. In reality you'd presumably have varying degrees of people being into each other but as long as everyone's fine with it and no one feels limited by the group fidelity it's fine.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

wait i just realized, are you actually saying that being married to multiple people is bad somehow?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Personally, thanks to polygamy's history and recency to current times, yes, I think being married to multiple people is a bad idea. I'm for keeping it illegal until we can be sure it won't be used like that again. I don't think now is that time.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

i really don't like that reasoning, that sounds way to close to the reasoning used to make gay marriage illegal.

Who are you to decide whether i get to marry the people i love?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And I don't think it's valid at all to compare the two. Polygamists were never "oppressed", they were the ones doing the oppression (of their wives).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

"marriage" is often just a cover word for having sex though, especially in conservative circles where they avoid the word "sex".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I live in Utah where we have a relatively high number of polygamists, and they're all shit heads. My girlfriend works with a woman who was raised in a polygamist environment, and that lady went through some horrible trauma. Polyamory is the umbrella term that contains what you want, and it's best to stick to it so that modern polyamory isn't associated with groups like the FLDS or cunts like Warren Jeffs. Polyfidelity is more or less what my girlfriend and I practice with her other partner, so I totally understand the appeal. I'll say that I do wish multiple marriages were possible, since it's effectively what we want in the long run. We'll probably have to approximate it with some form of contract or corporation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are technically correct. However, "polygamy" as become strongly connoted towards cultish, radically patriarchal communities in which a man subjugates several women in an abusive relationship. If you actually want to be understood without fuss, "polyamory" will get your point across much more smoothly. All resistance to the haphazard evolution of language is futile.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Well that’s a medium sized yike.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Again, like the other commenter, do you mean polyamory? Cause polygamy is pretty gross and literally illegal in a lot of places. So calling it ‘objectively superior’ is kind of a red flag to a lot of people.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

again, if you read my reply to the other commenter, you'll see that you're confusing polygamy for polygyny.

...or are you saying that several people marrying each other is gross? if so, then i'd say you're the gross one here, what's wrong with a group of people loving each other and wanting to be exclusive within the group?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Polygyny is a form of polygamy, the practice of one person having multiple spouses. Polyamory is where multiple people are in a cooperative romantic relationship. There is a reason all 50 US states have laws against polygamy and not polyamory.

At no point have I expressed thinking polyamory is gross.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

At least for me it is, but not so extreme. It's kinda seasonal on a weekly basis

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Truly the only way to be the town bicycle.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We have a word for that: abrosexual.

Here's the flag:

Flag with five stripes: light green, pale green, white, pale pink, and hot pink

As you can imagine, our main in-jokes are watermelons and indecisiveness.

There's also a subreddit at r/abrosexual, and a community at [email protected] (although the latter isn't very active).

Source: I am abrosexual

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Is this actually a thing or are you shit posting? Because I can't tell anymore.

Edit, holy crap it's real! Finally I feel like I'm actually represented by a sexuality :)

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I think every non-polar sexuality subs' in jokes are indecisiveness

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pro thats just the flag oft Italy 💀

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

italosexual

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Italy with shading

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bro had post-nut clarity. And as a proud gay, I say samesies... wtf was I watching?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

say gex baby

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

We've all had nights like that.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
239 points (98.0% liked)

196

16224 readers
3268 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS