this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
511 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
1735 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need a WiFi standard that isn’t fucking bullshit (has cryptographic identity), and that can be expanded to devices too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Using the local network for the connection is a garbage plan because Wi-Fi coverage and availability is not consistent enough to become mainstream. I am aware of two practical solutions for this: instant hotspot (assuming the sharing app can temporarily reconfigure the wifi settings, and wifi encryption keys can be transferred with a QR code) or OnionShare (uses TOR to make a sharable link using any firewall/NAT configuration, share the link with a QR code).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You don’t need to use TCPIP with WiFi. It can be ad-hoc and some other protocol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

yeah I just researched and learned about wifi direct

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

By “WiFi” I mean the wireless protocol, which is confusing because that includes Bluetooth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...b-but I hate Bluetooth with a passion...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

That’s the data on top of it. Some sort of universal sharing protocol would have some kind of broadcast, either over a LAN or over the air, then there would be a handshake which would exchange MACs and cryptographic keys, then the actual exchange of data.

It would have nothing to do with Bluetooth, it would just use the 802.11 public use bands.