196

16509 readers

2640 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

321

Solution Rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Cons; the blade will weigh a metric fuckton.

That's about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wouldn't a heavy blade be a good thing? So you can ensure a clean cut on the way down?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh sure, to get a good cut, you need a heavy blade.

The point is... who's gonna lift it up?

You can see the heft a blade meant for a single head has in this video from guys who made one this summer: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RPO7fm_ZtlY (it's a short no long video)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perhaps the design could be altered.

I know the appeal of a guillotine is that it's fairly simple, but if we're gonna scale it up for maximal decapitating efficiency, then I feel like we can afford to have a motor with some horsepower lift the blade. Maybe two to make keeping both sides of the blade even easier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Nah just add a decent pulley and maybee thicker beams so it wont collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)