this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
233 points (85.2% liked)
196
16363 readers
1681 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You are projecting your insecurities, my guy.
Like, you're over here complaining about hypergamy at the same time that you're whining about this very pedophilic "hit the wall" business. What's wrong with being 35, exactly? Won't you be 35 one day?
Don't misunderstand me, I'm not part of those groups. But I do see them growing and the issue is that those groups are the only ones courting those people.
Nothing wrong with 35. But people are most definitely influenced by relationships they've had. Running those numbers up doesn't seem to be beneficial for anyone in terms of long term happiness.
And what do you mean projecting? I've seen clips of women on TV saying that. That's not me saying it.
They might be growing. I feel like I haven't heard about MGTOW in a while, but whatever. And, it is true the right wing apparatus is built to court men's favor specifically, yeah. But that apparatus socializes them into pretty toxic people. When people complain about men, those conservative attitudes are what they're talking about.
Unless you hang out in some strange circles. It's obviously possible someone just really hates men, but letting that overshadow a real criticism is pretty god damn silly, in my opinion.
I'm just not sure what any of this has to do with women not being sterling marriage material.
This is what I mean about projection. You've got a chip on your shoulder about something, and so from a tweet with a fairly benign take on men as a culture, we get this insecure, jealous, whataboutism about careerless women being owed alimony, I guess.
I would agree that the left gives up too much social capital about men to the right.
I need to have a chip on my shoulder to think the original post could easily be written about both sexes? Does that mean you have a chip on your shoulder against men? I don't follow your logic.
To be this spiteful about it? Kinda. You're treating this like a tit-for-tat battle of the sexes for dominance in society, a contest to prove which one really is better, instead of, you know, a grievance somebody has with men as a culture.
Let's imagine you're right, that women aren't great. Would this mean that the men who are socialized not to be desirable don't have anything to do, then? Because both sexes are equally awful, neither one is obligated to improve?