this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1028 points (100.0% liked)

196

16566 readers
1874 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I think you're kind of missing the point, having solar panels in parking lots would add use to otherwise useless land. There's plenty of them in the US and it would also create a relief from the concrete hotspots that it makes. I mean have you ever been walking through a parking lot and hating your life because you're sweating so much?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I get that. That really makes sense. Tho it kind of makes it harder to then justify getting rid of parking to improve density. But this will most likely also not happen otherwise so yeah

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This idea has been around 20 years...

The problem has always been cost.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Costs that have dropped precipitously over the past 20 years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not the cost of the panels, it's the cost of the structure to hold them. And the maintenance involved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

There are solar generating facilities literally everywhere now. To mount them high enough to park under is a miniscule cost difference. There are also already massive parking lots with covers all over the place. We have probably 5,000+ covered parking spaces at the airport in my city, for example