this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
310 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Surely the clearest path to retaining only the best.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I feel like helping local economy is the only valid reason against work from home.

But, you know. Not like better city planning wouldn't help this.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You should have a local economy where you live...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My city of 3000 people certainly appreciates us buying locally. Some other city that's 100x the size? They're gonna be fine. Is the real estate price really so important business would rather make us buy goods from nearby places?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Companies have heavy commercial real estate bags. They are justifying their investments by forcing RTO

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I genuinely refuse to believe that it is more profitable for them to pay for AC, water and electricity that RTO would require. There has to be something else I am missing. Is it all just managers justifying their stupid decisions to other managers?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Part of it is management that can't handle their duties if they can't walk over and intimidate workers. The other bit is many companies have cash reserves invested in commercial real estate instruments, and can't handle the profoilo hit. And many of those company leaders are also personally invested in that same real estate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's like buying a very expensive pool, even though it costs money to run and service, you already bought it and will invite people to come and swim in it to justify the purchase, even though it's a giant money sink.

You can't just give it back that's also wasting money, so what are you going to do?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Imagine reading in a national newspaper that a government official wanted workers back downtown to fix the downtown economy and then learning 3 days later that you must start showing up to an office to sit on Teams calls with your nationally dispersed team.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Working from home does help the local economy, just not the right ones for the C-suite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As much as I hate to admit it, the conversations that happen because I overheard another conversation a couple cubes over do have value.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

If they have value to the company then how about sharing the costs of commuting? A 50-50 split seems reasonable to me. The company gets the value of those conversations, and the plebs get some help with all that fuel they now have to buy, at ridiculous prices due to high oil prices.