this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
2365 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Never heard of soulseek, used to torrent stuff back in the day, now not so much. Am I missing out?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It followed in the footsteps of Napster and limewire as a P2P client, primarily for sharing music. Unlike its predecessors, it survived basically unchanged for the last decades, basically just flying under the radar.

I still recommend it, though I think Nicotine+ is a better client (its a different frontend for the same network). It's not necessarily better than torrenting, just different. It also has chatrooms which I used to quite enjoy as a youngster back in the early 2000s.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the recommendation!

Where did the name Nicotine come from?

I was in a geeky mood and was browsing http://www.bash.org’s QDB. I stumbled across this quote:

so tempting to release a product called ‘nicotine’ and wait for the patches. then i would have a reason to only apply one patch a day. otherwise, i’m going against medical advise.

So I thought what the hell and bluntly stole etc’s idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well that solves that mystery, which I've idly wondered about but not enough to look it up. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

it's on the homepage lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nicotine+ is a better client because it's more actively developed. The official Soulseek client hasn't had an update in 3 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

the Soulseek client actually gets updated, it's that the updates are not published on the homepage but on the forum

https://groups.google.com/g/soulseek-discussion/c/E69FDwm1puw/m/FGOazKBoAAAJ

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

it's kind of like torrenting but there's a search engine, individual transactions are one-to-one, you can browse all the files a user shares, and I don't think ISPs know about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Sounds exactly like Usenet, or any of the GNUtella network stuff back in the day (bearshare, limewire, etc.)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's an old P2P app focused on music, it's been like 20 years since I last used it but at the time you could find pretty much anything no matter how obscure.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

That's still the case. It's my go-to for anything niche that can't be found elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I had to redownload it to find Xiu Xiu’s Drunk Commentary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

You used to be able to find just about any music on soulseek. I used to use it a lot 20 years ago, I assume from the name popping to still that you still can.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Just wondering, other than the obvious free tier audio quality (high is server side) what is the general consensus on using a modded client for premium features? I just don't have the option of network related stuff like torrenting or direct download + self hosting, as in my current situation I'm not my own admin. It's worked pretty well in my experience though I plan on subscribing to tidal soon for higher audio quality. Modded clients also seem more ethical to me as usage still count towards an artist's stream count (and thus paycheck, popularity, etc). It feels good as I ended up being a top listener for a newer artist I like as she was coming to popularity, and my streams + sharing spotify links to friends contributed a lot to their growth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I get it, I take partial credit for the Bourne Ultimatum winning a best editing Oscar due to my emailing the agents of academy members letting them know it was solely the work of editing that kept audiences from puking in the theaters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I personally use xManager because I don't download every single piece of music I listen to (no matter how hard I try) so I would recommend it, but I would regularly backup likes / playlists because of the risk of a ban