this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

836 readers
18 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Miami Miami
3. Ohio State Ohio State
4. Penn State Penn State
5. Notre Dame Notre Dame
6. Indiana Indiana
7. Georgia Georgia
8. Texas A&M Texas A&M
9. Texas Texas
10. BYU BYU
11. Tennessee Tennessee
12. Clemson Clemson
13. Iowa State Iowa State
14. Alabama Alabama
15. Pitt Pitt
16. LSU Louisiana State
T-17. Kansas State Kansas State
T-17. SMU SMU
19. Ole Miss Mississippi
20. Army Army
21. Boise State Boise State
22. Illinois Illinois
T-23. Colorado Colorado
T-23. Washington State Washington State
25. Virginia Tech Virginia Tech

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

So THAT'S the secret to a dominant d...

Also for what it's worth sign stealing has always been an interesting topic for me. Let's say you as a player notice that every time the rb lines up somewhere the ball goes to him, so you start to play based on that. That seems fine to me. And let's say as a coach you notice a certain percent of their plays in previous games are in a certain package, so you gameplan for that. Again seems fine. But sign stealing is just a logical extension of those two things. I don't think I actually support sign stealing, but it's just curious that I can't actually criticize it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Your first two examples open up more opportunities for outplays. The opposing team can recognize that you have picked up on their patterns and then run fake-out plays to catch you off guard. Sign stealing just allows you to know exactly what the other team is about to do and there is no opportunity for them to fake you out. (Other than switching to a new set of signs, but learning signs is boring for the players and not entertaining for the audience).

To equate it to poker: Your first two examples are similar to learning one of your opponents tells. If you start to exploit their tell, they can start faking it to force you to fold or place a bad bet. Sign stealing is like taking a peak at their cards

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don't see any material difference, signs can be changed easier than formations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Actually a fantastic analogy. And like I said, I don't much care for sign stealing, I think there are better ways to more reliably put yourself in a position to win. I just think it's funny that we expect and even encourage the runner on second to watch the signs but as soon as it's somebody with a camera it's against the rules.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Stealing signs themselves isn't against rules, and is overblown. There was a pre-covid pro game where Tony Romo called basically every play as an announcer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the biggest secret to a dominant D is playing teams who's total wins are less than your own wins.

The sign stealing isn't necessarily the big thing, it's the illegal scouting of teams. This is like the 10th shady thing facing Harbaugh in the last few years, it's really starting to add up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which, to continue playing devil's advocate, is kinda funny to me in the same way. Like yeah sure you can watch tape on somebody, but no way no how are you allowed to go watch them in person.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

No one ever accused the NCAA of having good rules...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guess Harbaugh telling the NCAA to fuck off about the hamburgers is having consequences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Very real chance he walks after this season and the NCAA either punishes another school after the problem is gone, or nothing happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Especially if Michigan wins it all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Mizzou looking awful unpunished these days...