this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1350 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26856 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Remember kids, don't ever plug something in to your computer that you don't trust or are unsure about. Picking up flashdrive off the street and plugging them in is one of the easiest ways to get malware installed on your computer.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's why I take mine in to work to plug in.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

to a coworker's laptop.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Gotta test it on the expendable company network before you take it home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Theres also usb drives that are designed to short circuit your computer. Frying the motherboard.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

USB Killers are expensive though. No one's intentionally ditching those for randos to find

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

one of the easiest ways to get malware installed on your computer

Only if you are the child of an Iran nuclear engineer. (cough stuxnet cough. )

If not, visiting .ru porn sites is much more likely to lead to infection.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

visiting .ru porn sites is much more likely to lead to infection.

I did that once. Now it burns when IP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It’s also the easiest way to distribute malware

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Let's hope these don't carry Linux ISOs, which would be a very problematic drug to deal with.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I carried a USB stick with a Linux ISO once and my object in life has been to dethrone God and destroy capitalism ever since.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I agree with your purposes. Good luck, fellow lemmer.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

And folks this is what happens when your first disto is Red Star OS

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Mint?.... MINT? We're a RED HAT household Mister! You have some explaining to do!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always just hand out slips of paper with the BlueRay encryption key 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't that HD-DVD?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I might be dumb but how many books would 64gbs mean

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd say roughly 1,000 to 100,000, depending on format.

Edit: Raw ASCII (7-bit) could give you up to ~half a million.

Edit 2: According to Randall Munroe (to lazy to find the source), you could theoretically store one ~~word~~ letter per bit. That would give us up to ~~ten~~ two million books.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Edit 2: According to Randall Munroe (to lazy to find the source), you could theoretically store one word letter per bit. That would give us up to ten two million books.

I don't see how that is possible, I think it is be one letter per byte.

Bit only represents one state 1 or 0, or true or false. It is too little information to store a letter.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here ya go:

Based on the rates of correct guesses—and rigorous mathematical analysis—Shannon determined that the information content of typical written English was around 1.0 to 1.2 bits per letter.

https://what-if.xkcd.com/34/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's based on common entropy limits of written information. It's also why I always Bachelor domestic extended doubtful as concerns at. Morning prudent removal an letters by. On could my in order never it. Or excited certain sixteen it to parties colonel. Depending conveying direction has led immediate. Law gate her well bed life feet seen rent. On nature or no except it sussex.

Of on affixed civilly moments promise explain fertile in. Assurance advantage belonging happiness departure so of. Now improving and one sincerity intention allowance commanded not. Oh an am frankness be necessary earnestly advantage estimable extensive. Five he wife gone ye. Mrs suffering sportsmen earnestly any. In am do giving to afford parish settle easily garret.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One letter per bit? You'd need some crazy effective compression algorithm for that, because a bit is 1 or 0. Did you mean byte?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

UTF-8 and ASCII are normally already 1 character per byte. With great file compression, you could probably reach 2 characters per byte, or one every 4 bits. One character every bit is probably impossible. Maybe with some sort of AI file compression, using an AI's knowledge of the English language to predict the message.

Edit: Wow, apparently that already exists, and it can achieve even higher of a compression ratio, almost 10:1! (with 1gb of UTF-8 (8 bit) text from Wikipedia) bellard.org/nncp/

If an average book has 70k 5 character words, this could compress it to around 303 kb, meaning you could fit 1.6 million books in 64 gb.

You can get a 2tb ssd for around $70. With this compression scheme you could fit 52 million books on it.

I'm not sure if I've interpreted the speed data right, but It looks like it would take around a minute to decode each book on a 3090. It would take about a year to encode all of the books on the 2tb ssd if you used 50 a100s (~$9000 each). You could also use 100 3090s to achieve around the same speed (~$1000 each)

52 million books is around the number of books written in the past 20 years, worldwide. All stored for $70 (+$100k of graphics cards)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's something comical about the low low price of $70 (+$100k of graphics cards) still leaving out the year of time it will take.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Not dumb to ask

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Have a couple old pirated e-textbooks as .pdf files on my PC from uni, several hundred pages with color images, and they are mostly under 50MB, averaging about 30MB. 1GB is a little over a thousand MB (1024) so 1 would maybe hold a bit under 50 or so each? So times 64 that, a hell of a lot. Several thousand total, at least, as size varies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

More than have been banned, I think.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a shitload. 64000 if it were simple text only stuff with 1MB per book, 640 if it were 100MB chonkers full of images

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s so depressing how this meme is gonna get turned into a real thing by the right claiming it’s real

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But this is unironically good

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Mein Kandy!!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would be very interested in the list of banned books, and how it would be curated.

For 64gb, you might have to extend the years to be: banned books ever, and then break down that list by reason. Just to fill space you'd end up including dubious books, and you'd need to be clear on where/who/why a book got banned.

A book being 'banned' from a pre-school for being 'not age appropriate' by some pointless helicopter parent wouldn't count unless the book was actually age appropriate.

Then you would need a category of 'banned by author banned'(or similar). Books that were considered age appropriate at the time, but now definitely aren't. I'm thinking here of the recent removal/editing of Dr Seuss books to remove problematic racial stereotype. Not necessarily banned in their original form, perhaps, but still censored (perhaps, rightly so for the target age).

64GB is a lot of books. You would end up even including 'The tale of (Darth) Pelagius'

(Pelagius was considered a heretic in the early years of the church, and his writings were banned)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as they're not books on kinky sex that you share with kids because you're pure evil, I support you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

My mother was a women's studies major and we literally had an entire bookshelf of material about sex and sexuality growing up. It's weird how I had literally no interest in it prior to a certain biological epoch, at which point it became an extremely useful tool for independent learning.

Weird how now I am a well adjusted adult who has a healthy relationship with my own sexuality as well as my partners' and I haven't ever raped anyone even a little bit!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Bomb the publishers! War on books now!

load more comments
view more: next ›