this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
416 points (98.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35962 readers
4237 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 137 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_health-savings-account-issue-spotlight_2024-04.pdf

CFPB is aware of the issue. I'm guessing that the incoming administration is not going to care about fees.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And thank GOD! if a Business wants to Steal ALL my Money that just makes them GOOD BUSINESSMEN! If I wanted Rights I would Lift up my Bootstraps!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Stealing is smart

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

It'll trickle down

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

No no see the problem is that you have money, and you need to give them that money otherwise they can't get more money

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is because you are not the customer. Your employer is the customer, they are the ones who get to choose the HSA provider for their employees. You are the goods to be sold. The HSA provider is simply harvesting profits.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, I hate it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

"You are not the customer, you are the product" is true so often, but in many cases (like this one) it doesn't really apply.

First off, "not the customer but the product" is an inherently antagonistic relationship. Your goals are opposed to Facebook's, for instance, because you want to spend less time on the platform and you want to interact with friends and not brands, but Facebook wants the opposite of both. But with HSA administration, your goals and your employer's goals are aligned: you both want someone who will quickly and painlessly manage your account without being a pain.

Second, "not the customer but the product" implies an undisclosed, extractive payment occurring behind the scenes. TikTok is harvesting a great deal of data from you and selling it to other companies. You are the product in that your data has value. But with HSA administration, the product is just the management of your HSA money; there's no under-the-table dealing going on here (or there shouldn't be); they're getting paid by your company for their services.

Third, "not the customer but the product" relationships are entirely one-way; you have no way to impact the providing company beyond just not using their services. They do not, will not, and at some level can never care about your experience beyond making it as minimally useful to you to keep you on the platform. But that HSA provider desperately needs your company's business, so if enough of your coworkers raise a stink and get your company to complain, they will make a change.

In actuality, "not the customer but the product" ignores the unfortunate reality of most HR/payroll service companies in this case: they're just the lowest bidder, contracted at the bottom dollar to provide the cheapest services possible, because your employers don't have to use their services and don't care about your experience.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I left two cents in mine and just left it as is. I like to think that every time those pirates send me a letter telling me I have 2 cents left or send me checks which I don’t cash it costs them money.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

It does cost them money, more than you have in the account.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

At the very least, the USPS is getting money out of them. More than the 2¢, even.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Drain it to zero and then let them auto close it for inactivity. Or keep it open forever since there’s no admin fee.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago

I've had one open for years that is empty. I think they're hoping I eventually put money in it so they can drain it for the years it sat unused.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The admin fee is $0. Can you just transfer all of the money out and keep the account empty?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is exactly what I do. Spend all the money out of the account and delete my login. Done this at least a couple times and I’ve never had an issue. What are they gunna do? File a bullshit claim on my credit?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Honest question: why? I’ve only been able to use an HSA once, and I thought the big advantage is that it’s your money you can keep and use whenever. Can’t you just keep using it normally, ideally save some of it?

In my case, my ex got it put in our divorce judgement that I would carry “traditional” insurance, so I knew that my HSA had no future

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, I spent the money using the American healthcare system. Because my insurance sucks so much that I often get shafted with huge bills. One such recent one was learning I had to get hearing aids out of pocket as my plan had no coverage. That is why my HSA is gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

HSAs are an annoying attempt to fix US health insurance. They are tax free (meaning your money goes farther), but you can only contribute to them if you have a high deductible health insurance plan.

Additionally, you are limited to a couple thousand a year in contributions and that money can only be used for approved health expenses. The slight upside is that the money won't ever go away, meaning you can keep building up your HSA and even invest it.

Where it's gotten weird is that many people actually just use it as tax deffered savings, as after 65 (I think) the money becomes general use.

However, this means HSAs primarily benefit wealthier people by only really being accessible to those who already have insurance and have excess money to contribute.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

You can’t contribute to the HSA but can spend it on qualified medical expenses or sit on it until age 59.5 and draw it down or use it to pay Medicare premiums starting at 65.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Hey, Jackal, is the Kuzko's poison?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Does it benefit the company in some way to have empty accounts on their books?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had this happen a couple jobs ago - I successfully spent it down to $1, but the they wouldn’t transfer that little. I suppose I may still legally have this amount somewhere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That schedule of fees looks like it's straight from the 1980's.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It deceives people whose idea of how things work in large companies hasn't changed since the days when it was the manager of your bank branch who decided if you you should get a loan or not.

Nowadays, for certain in middle and large size companies, all the administrative main business pathways are heavilly if not totally automated and it's customer support that ends up eating the most manpower (which is why there has been so much of a push for automated phone and chat support systems, of late using AI).

Those $25 bucks for "account closure" pays at worst for a few minutes of somebody's seeking the account from user information on a computer, cross checking that the user information matches and then clicking a button that says "Close accout" and then "Ok" on the confirmation box and the remaining 99% or so left after paying for that cost are pure profit.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

No lollygagging!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reminds me of when my ISP who was "no contract" had a cancellation fee. Like I have to pay money to stop being billed? Something about that feels very backwards.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yep,

I don't consent to that charge.

Oh, it's one of our rules.

Too bad so sad, no contract.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

fee fee fee fee fee fee

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

When I was looking for a non-employer HSA, there's a lot of providers out there with not-exactly-predatory terms. All kind of fees or restrictions that you wouldn't find on other types of checking/saving/brokerage accounts. I ended up a Lively, but they added some investment/transfer fees when Schwab bought Lively's investment partner TDA.

I suspect it's partly because most HSA are determined by the employer, so someone in HR can be induced to choose a fee-laden plan if it's easier for them, and partly because the tax benefits are so great that it still makes sense even after paying a $20 junk fee here and there.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

This is not mildly infuriating. This should just be illegal. Paying money to close your account is beyond infuriating

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

HSAs are a misdirect to get you to ignore how shitty high deductible plans are. Never take the high deductible plan.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It depends though. If you are relatively healthy with no chronic issues (yet) and have enough saved for an emergency, it can save you a good amount of tax-free money that you can use for when you get older and sicker. That and the monthly premium is much lower than a PPO. Obviously universal healthcare is still the best option.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My company has high deductible plan with $1800 deductible and another with $3600 deductible. I just divide those by 12 and add to monthly premium when comparing against HMO/PPO plans.

I'm single and old.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

I save money with the HSA/high deductible. I always plan around using 100% of deductible. Premium plus HSA contribution is less than the PPO option.

I'll never pick an 80/20 plan. They generally charge more and cover less.

And I'm an old hag and have recently got cataract surgery in both eyes, hearing aids, etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

HSAs are also a way to get healthy people away from wanting universal health care by catering to their self interest, just like how IRAs were intended to let people with money invest in retirement which eroded support for social security.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It really depends. My company, you always do the high deductible. The OOP Max is only $5k compared to $13k for the other. The difference in premiums plus my employers contribution to the HSA are more than the difference between the two deductibles. The plans cover the same stuff. I don't really get why they're set up how they are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

My company offers something similar, but I worry it's a short term incentive to get more people onto HDPs and then quietly make that the only option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

The fact that you get charged for a paper statement and that is not an opt in is more infuriating.

load more comments
view more: next ›