194
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Trump was a quiet presence inside court, but outside he said ‘deranged’ judge overseeing case ‘should be out of office’

Not many defendants would dare to brand the judge overseeing their case “deranged”, call for them to be kicked out of office and dismiss the suit against them as a “witch-hunt”. Not many defendants are Donald Trump.

On the first day of a civil fraud case that could decide the future of his business career, Trump cut an angry, uncomfortable figure. “This is a judge that should be out of office,” he told reporters as the court broke for lunch. “This is a judge that some people say could be charged criminally for what he’s doing.”

In court, in a navy suit and light blue tie, Trump was a quieter presence. Hunched at times and conferring with his lawyers, he mostly listened quietly as lawyers for the New York attorney general outlined their case.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 86 points 11 months ago

He's a fucking baggy minge that cunt.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago

I don't understand your comment, but I'm behind the general spirit of it!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

He means “steak drapes”

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Where can one learn to speak like this? I would pay for this class.

No idea if this is true but it sounds like something straight out of Trainspotting… I can almost hear the accent in my head. No offense hopefully, I’m just a dumb Yank.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

You're thinking Lock Stock or Snatch, more like it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Snatch is the only movie I pirated and was not disappointed when it wasn't a porno.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Beef Curtains...

[-] [email protected] 75 points 11 months ago

It is really stupid to say things about the judgeb in a jury trial.

It is incredibly stupid to say things about the judge in a bench trial.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

It is, unless as every other time before, Trump faces no consequences for his actions.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

He's attempting to tilt the judge to appeal for a mistrial

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Good thing most judges are old enough and wise enough to see his grandstanding for what it is and not give it to him.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

It's only stupid when you have to face any consequences

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I really hope, this time, tRump faces the find out part of fuck around and find out.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago

I get it; he’s rich, really rich…or was…maybe…idk…but why is it so hard to understand that he is US Citizen (SSN) #999-99-9999. Treat him like literally every other person, if you’d hold them in contempt, the same goes for Trump.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Right, damn his supporters and bootlickers. All I want is for them to do their fucking jobs. Who cares about his title, past our present. Just. Do. Your. Fucking. Job.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago

If he hasn't learned what "don't piss off the judge" means by now his ass is grass. Grass that smells like shit.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

His lawyers fucked up and the judge, not a jury, gets to decide liability. Really stupid to attack the person in charge of the ultimate outcome of your case.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

You know, every time he says something dumb I think to myself, “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard”. I then wait about a week,tops and he manages to say something dumber-er. Amazing.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

He said dumber shit on the daily.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Shit-talking the judge always does great things for your prospects in court.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Especially when that judge is your jury, too!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Very Henry II of you.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Bold move, Cotton

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Not many defendants would dare to brand the judge overseeing their case “deranged”, call for them to be kicked out of office and dismiss the suit against them as a “witch-hunt”.

On the first day of a civil fraud case that could decide the future of his business career, Trump cut an angry, uncomfortable figure.

In a hushed courtroom with secret service agents posted on all sides of the room, Trump sat directly facing the New York judge Arthur Engoron.

As the judge and the lawyers conferred, Trump gave the occasional scoff and eye roll but the fireworks were saved for outside the court.

After a three-year investigation the attorney general Letitia James, also present, has accused Trump and his sons of “grossly inflating” the value of the properties in order to secure business loans.

Habba also told the judge that the attorney general’s office had brought the case forward on political motivations, that people are mad that Trump’s real estate brand is so successful.


The original article contains 940 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
194 points (95.8% liked)

politics

18881 readers
3580 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS