this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
129 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There were a large number of duplicates posted today, first on the death of Diane Feinstein and again on the plea deal of one of the defendants in the Trump Georgia case.

I don't take removing posts lightly, so I want to explain my rationale here.

When someone visits a community, the last thing they should see is a bunch of articles on the same thing with more or less identical headlines. It splits the discussion, and reduces engagement with any single one of them.

There are a couple of different ways of handling it:

  1. Leave it alone, once the 24 hour news cycle works through, the front page will change and it will all be fine. This is where I started today, opening a discussion with the other mods, basically going "What do you think?"

  2. Keep the first post on each topic, remove the others as duplicates. This is what I've ended up doing. The OG posts on each topic seemed to have the most comments and the most upvotes, keep the discussion where it's at.

  3. Nuke ALL the posts and move it to megathreads. Remove all future content and direct to the megathread. I'm, generally, not a fan of this as it removes comments already made and stifles new posts which may have a different angle.

For example:

Yeah, there were a bunch of posts of "Diane Feinstein dies at 90", but there is also this post:

"The Diane Feinstein Paradox"
https://lemmy.world/post/5966546

That has more to say than just "dies at 90", and as such isn't a duplicate and I left it alone. In "the other place" the response would have been "subject contains Diane Feinstein, post removed, post in megathread" despite the fact that the article isn't about her death, it's about her life, and fundamentally has something different to say.

Similarly on the Georgia defendent striking a plea deal. Articles saying "hey, he made a plea deal" were removed as duplicates. The post of the courtroom video I left alone, because seeing the events first hand has a different impact and sparks a different discussion. Articles on the RAMIFICATIONS of the plea deal, I also left alone. Again, not the same as simply posting "there's a plea deal."

I hope all this makes sense and nobody takes the removals personally, it wasn't personal, I promise!

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Competent and transparent moderation in a fairly sized politics community. I am officially impressed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

You see enough bad examples, you want to set a good one. ;)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

I definitely appreciate it. When the Feinstein story hit, my entire feed was just duplicates of that story (multiple in this community plus identical posts in other politics communities).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not a fan of megathreads. Imo, it'd be best to keep the oldest post that links to a non-clickbait article, and if someone posts an article covering nearly the same content, remove/lock it and link to the other post.

EDIT: If it's about an ongoing topic that wouldn't be resolved for more than a few days, then a megathread might be appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think that's a reasonable attitude and I think you mods are doing a great job in this community, so thanks!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

not a fan of this as it removes comments already made

Would be great if there was some way to merge comments under one post.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Was thinking the same thing. Always bothered me when the mods over on nazi digg would remove a popular thread in favor of one that no one was using. Looked like they were just removing discussion about topics they didn't want anyone to talk about.

I'm glad the mods here are more thoughtful.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That all seems reasonable. Thank you for the mod work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Already too many with so many different communities too! I like number 2. If people want their link out there can post it in the first one. Thanks for the work your doing!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Great job on this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you went with the right option. I hate megathreads

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oddly enough, I didn’t see any of the posts you’re talking about. This is the first mention of Feinstein dying that I’ve seen, so thanks for the news, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Federation is WEIRD. There seems to be a lot of lag between what appears and what is removed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh hey I got linked in the post, nice

Yeah, I saw that there were a bunch of posts about her death and still thought mine was different enough to warrant posting

Although, I did make a post on the GA ramifications that I think was deleted. Maybe it was a duplicate, not sure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The megathread seems like the best approach. You can make it text-only and put all the article links in the post. That way all the traffic doesn't get given to the first link to get submitted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, we'll definitely do megathreads when there are bigger topics, the first primaries, Super Tuesday, Trump Trial dates, etc.

Fortunately, in this case, there were only 3 or 4 dupes on each topic so it was easier to just leave up the OG post and remove the others.

In the case where we might potentially get dozens of dupes, yeah, Megathread territory.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you pin a comment on the post for that first article that gives links to alternative articles? I don't know if that's possible on lemmy. But megathreads are annoying to me because they usually just have a list of articles that is overwhelming and it's much easier to just read none of them. Plus it doesn't interact well with continuing conversation once it falls off the front page.

If there were a way to remove posts from the feed (either everything/local/subscribed or the community+everywhere) without destroying the post itself it would be nice too because you wouldn't be deleting conversations. Then you could pin the other conversations on the first one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That would be ideal, but I don't think Lemmy supports that kind of nested structure. :(

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One bot posts it everywhere...

Then other bots do the same...

Front page covered in the same paid for fake news

Bot owners likely get paid for this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm naive, but I'd like to think we hear about that happening more often than it actually happens.

I still have a 16 or 17 year old reddit account, multiple hundreds of thousands of karma, in all the cool secret subs, top 1% of reddit, crap, I was even part of reddits FCC filing on net neutrality (funny how THAT turned out!) and not once was I ever approached about selling out.

Maybe I'm doing it wrong?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

are you a consultant employed by a social media "company"

Do you have an executed master services agreement with a media company or lobby group or another bad actor? That's is subject to MNDA

Do you have a work order in place to under which you will be paid based on "impressions" to promote so some bullshit to peasants online?

If not, then you are not part of that Eco system....