this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
329 points (98.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26559 readers
1654 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't mean BETTER. That's a different conversation. I mean cooler.

An old CRT display was literally a small scale particle accelerator, firing angry electron beams at light speed towards the viewers, bent by an electromagnet that alternates at an ultra high frequency, stopped by a rounded rectangle of glowing phosphors.

If a CRT goes bad it can actually make people sick.

That's just. Conceptually a lot COOLER than a modern LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

I guess, in a very liberal definition of the term, "cloud gaming". Specifically the old LodgeNet systems in hotels where you could rent Nintendo games by the hour to be streamed to your room from a physical console somewhere behind the front desk. Every room had a special controller with oodles of extra buttons on it hardwired to the television that also functioned as television remotes.

The service was objectively awful, of course, when factoring in how much the hotel charged compared to what little you got for it. But I've always found it fascinating.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The phones with the internal hidden camera, I was sure it would be the future

https://www.91mobiles.com/list-of-phones/pop-up-camera-phones

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I want this so I can be sure my phone isn't sneaking a peek at my pooping face

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

It is not, but for the sake of the argument it's ok.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 38 minutes ago

It is. Not to be confused with LCD.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Toasters. Specifically the Sunbeam Radiant Control toaster, with the tag line "Automatic Beyond Belief!". There is a fan site (https://automaticbeyondbelief.org/, excellent url). Like, what other appliance line has a fan site? Surely no modern day toaster!

But of course I first heard about it from Technology Connections video.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

I think a lot of old school products worked better than modern equivalents. Take toasters - when I was a kid our toaster consistently made toast with the same degree of doneness. I've had modern ones that said "microprocessor controlled" on them that couldn't make consecutive pieces the same. Also flashlights. Simple metal flashlights just worked. My new sophisticated one cycles through multiple levels of brightness and then strobing (so I can what, have my own rave?) but sudden motions make it spontaneously turn off. I mean how hard is an ON/OFF switch?

And what's the deal with airline food? I'm thinkin' hey!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

My grandmother used to have one. I never realized how it worked before that video, but I was always fascinated by the fact that the bread would lower itself

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

The original tv remote didn't use batteries. It used sound. Giant clunky devices with large tactile buttons. Never runs out of batteries and still works if your kid tries to block the screen to keep you from turning it off

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Our first TV remote was on a cable! This would have been in the early 80s I think.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Those remotes used little spring-loaded mechanical chimes that emitted ultrasonic notes. As a kid I discovered my parents' big console stereo would change channels if I clinked a handful of coins.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

Even the replacement and most modern remotes (with an LED at the tip that you have to point at the device) use pretty cool tech.

Usually to send data you want a data channel and a clock channel. When the clock changes say from high to low you read the next bit in the data channel. With one LED to send info you need to combine them.

For transmission that's easy. You make the low to high change at a fixed frequency. For the high to low change if it's a zero you make the high to low change 1/3 the way through the cycle. For a 1 you make the change 2/3 the way through the cycle.

On the receiver you you sync up a signal at the same frequency rising with the start of the transmission at a 1/2 on 1/2 off. You look at the data when the reference falls 1/2 the way through the cycle.

If a zero was sent the line had fallen at the 1/3 and it is a zero. If a one was sent the line doesn't drop until 2/3 and it's a one.

The trick is how do you get a signal at the same frequency and in synch. You compare the transmission frequency revived to the frequency of a voltage controlled oscillator. If it's slower you up the voltage and increase the frequency if it's faster you lower the voltage and lower the frequency.

You similarly use a phase detector to determine if they are in phase slightly boosting the frequency until they are in sync.

This system is called a phased lock loop (pll). All this so you don't have to getup to change the channel. The same sort of system is used for reading data from the magnetic disk on a hard drive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

How did it generate that sound without batteries? Was it literally the audio from the clicking of the buttons? Genuine questions.

edit: Thanks for the several answers. They all seem prone to interference, but it is nice that they worked without power.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

The button pressed a spring-loaded thing that struck a piece of metal, almost like a wind chime, emitting an ultrasonic note. I discovered by accident that I could make my parents' stereo change channels by clinking coins together.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Tuning forks!!! The Zenith clicker The buttons would work strikers that would hit tuned rods. A different one doing a different function.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Zenith Space Command remote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Buttons and springs would make it click loudly at a predicable frequency.

It's why remotes are often referred to as "clickers".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Ice. As time has gone by, it has become less cool.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

The force is strong with this one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I will beat you to death with a wet piece of tissue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

No, you wont. Ill shield wall that joke all day long

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Before transistors there were vacuum tubes which did the same thing but using very different principles (and were also way bigger, even than traditional transistors and billions of times more than the transistors in the most modern ICs)

Before electric milling or even steam milling, flour used to be milled using watermills and windmills which, IMHO, are way cooler.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Steam millers sound way cooler than windmills

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

a 127mm vacuum tube, quite large, is equivalent to 127,000,000 nm which is only 63.5 million times bigger than a cutting edge transistor so that estimate seems a little exaggerated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That's just the length, if you are comparing volumes it's an under estimate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Thats fair I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

I was too tired to go beyond "1nm = 10^-9^ hence 1 billion" and actually do the maths ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Replying to this just so people are less likely to accidentally scroll past.

Completely agree, of course. I do miss Web 1.0, when you had to go to IRC, usenet, etc, for the "social" part.

load more comments
view more: next ›