Ask Lemmy

26567 readers

1988 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

373

What's a technology that was cooler in its older iterations? (pawb.social)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

411 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't mean BETTER. That's a different conversation. I mean cooler.

An old CRT display was literally a small scale particle accelerator, firing angry electron beams at light speed towards the viewers, bent by an electromagnet that alternates at an ultra high frequency, stopped by a rounded rectangle of glowing phosphors.

If a CRT goes bad it can actually make people sick.

That's just. Conceptually a lot COOLER than a modern LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Older forms of computer RAM.

Before integrated circuits, we had core memory which was a grid of wires and at each intersection was a little magnetic donut that held a single 1 or 0.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory

Before that they had delay line memory, where they used vibrations traveling down a long tube of mercury, and more bits meant a longer tube to store a longer wave train.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay-line_memory

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Even though the story involves drum memory instead, your mention of delay-lines reminds me of The Story of Mel, a Real Programmer. Y'all should read the whole thing (it's not long), but here's a quick excerpt:

 Mel's job was to re-write
 the blackjack program for the RPC-4000.
 (Port?  What does that mean?)
 The new computer had a one-plus-one
 addressing scheme,
 in which each machine instruction,
 in addition to the operation code
 and the address of the needed operand,
 had a second address that indicated where, on the revolving drum,
 the next instruction was located.

 In modern parlance,
 every single instruction was followed by a GO TO!
 Put *that* in Pascal's pipe and smoke it.

 Mel loved the RPC-4000
 because he could optimize his code:
 that is, locate instructions on the drum
 so that just as one finished its job,
 the next would be just arriving at the "read head"
 and available for immediate execution.
 There was a program to do that job,
 an "optimizing assembler",
 but Mel refused to use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They use to have weaving grannies for the magnetic core memory production.