You see less AI generated fewer.

You see less ai generated imagery

Unless they meant that individual images had less AI generation in them.

(I'm with you, words matter)

I gotta fewer

and the only rescription is

more bowcell

Ranier Wolfcastle in front of a brick wall saying "that's the joke."

Thank you. I should have gotten that.

Good old toupee fallacy.

I recently saw a photo on some website. It was from a Trump rally, and people had these freaky, ecstatic looks on their faces. Somebody commented that it looked like AI. Other people soon agreed; one of them remarked on the bizarre, "alien" hand on one of the babies in the crowd. That hand did look weird. There were too few fingers. It looked like a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle hand.

The problem was that this image was originally from a news story that was years prior to ChatGPT and the current AI boom. For this to be AI, the photographer would've had to have access to experimental software that was years away from being released to the public.

Sometimes people just look weird and, sometimes, they have weird hands, too.

Reminds me of all the people who believe commercials and advertising doesn't work on them. Sure, that's why billions are spent on it. Because it doesn't even do anything. Oh it only works on all the other people?

That's why it is so hard to get that stuff regulated. People believe it doesn't work on them.

A more timely example is the people who think they can always tell when someone is trans.

Ofck

Alt text: a beautiful girl on a dock at sunset with some fugly hands and broken ass fingees

I've never seen a good answer to this in accessibility guides, would you mind making a recommendation? Is there any preferred alt text for something like:

• "clarification image with an arrow pointing at object"
• "Picture of a butt selfie, it's completely black"
• "Picture of a table with nothing on it"
• "example of lens flare shown from camera"
• "N/A" dangerous

Sometimes an image is clearly only useful as a visual aid, I feel like "" (exluding it) makes people feel like they are missing the joke. But given it's an accessibility tool; unneeded details may waste your time.

Wish I had more upvotes to give.

People are in denial: AI is a good thing.

Not in our broken ass system. First we need an economic system where people want to, but don't need to work.

if you don't have a job, you don't get paid, so you lack basic things.

if robots just did everything, and necessities (food, water, heating, cooling, etc) were free, then that would be great. unfortunately, that's not the reality we live in right now, so of course plenty of people (including myself) don't like AI.

I agree 100% with this. Often arguments "against" AI summarize to "it is my suffering what gave my art value, so yours has none."

Bro, that's what capitalism told you. Your issue is not the "value" of AI it is the system that assigns and controls said value.

Oh great, instead of me, a machine owned by a capitalist will produce the art! /s

Well, it's good — if some of the profits of the increased productivity make it to the people who aren't billionaires or multimillionaires.