[-] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Legitimate reasons could be contrived. The question isn't what it takes to get a PI to investigate, the question should be what it would take for them to spill unrelated tea.

The first step in opening an investigation is investigate your client. Their relationship to the subject and the validity of the harms that they might have suffered or the validity of whatever narrative of criminality.

If you manage to pass that smell test, the information you get from the investigation would be severely limited to the scope of validating and proving that the harms occurred.

Again, you could get them to do stuff for you. You might not be able to get any useful information past that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

So do you know what a PI is generally hired for?

There's a narrow swatch of misbehavior that the "skeletons" would need to be, for a PI to take the case and get involved. The client would have to have some vested interest or harm done to them, or some idea that the target is doing some harm to somebody before taking the case.

If the idea was get dirt to be vindictive, the PI would not take the case.

If they did take the case and there was evidence that things were clearly criminal, (quid pro quo, malfeasance, etc) they would refer the case to actual police. They would only continue investigating if the police declined to investigate, and their purpose would be privately prosecuting the person. ( Basically filing a suit to whatever court, like you were suing the person but you prove the criminal acts and they get sentenced potentially)

If the skeleton was more of a civil harm like a breach of duty or breach of contract, the PI would gather evidence relevant to the harm, and not provide their client with irrelevant information like who their favorite callgirl is or whatever bathhouse they frequent. They would also not share info about infidelity unless their client was the spouse that was being cheated on.

Still, what you think a legitimate reason could or couldn't be probably doesn't match up with what actually would be the basis of some surveillance.

This comment is super cliff notes, and based on some PI training in Ontario Canada that I couldn't make myself complete after I realised that it would be more of the same bullshit shiftwork that I was trying to get away from 10 years ago.

OP might have a good time calling some PI firms local to them and asking to pay for a consult and fact check his narrative.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

He left his 20 year old wife of four years, mother to his 4 year old child, for a 19 year old.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I can kick 200cm from the ground, so I'm going to use that tool to keep the world just :/

Edit OH SHIT OH SHIT 180CM not 200 I'm not Jet Li

[-] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

pistachios

Well how bougie of you

[-] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago

There have been more different boobs since then right

[-] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

This is a brain-dead take when the USA has prosecuted people for intentionally spreading diseases.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's good enough

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

He was too busy being good to everyone around him to have time for anything else.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I do this....

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

This dude is juicing wow look at that glow

3
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I spy with my little eye something something Pi.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

There was some windbag that was talking about winning handshakes years ago, this mindset definitely extends to that.

51
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Chicken in a takeout box

view more: next ›

bane_killgrind

joined 3 months ago