this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
135 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3890 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This would backfire drastically for republicans...

Pretty sure the US military is the biggest socialist organization on the planet.

I know it's what made me progressive.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

It certainly pointed me in that direction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it's going to be really hard to call anything a "handout" if you're forced to give the government your labor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fr this is a great idea (National Service, but not necessarily military service). We could train carpenters and electricians, repair people, maintenance and construction jobs. We could train medical assistants and dental hygienists', vet techs, and build houses (high density housing located in an area with good public transit, of course), and railways, and so much more with our tax dollars.

And yes, a strong defense is important, so military service would count too. Like it or not lots of people across the world rely on American defense, and its wrong to betray those allies and obligations like Obama did when he let Russia take Crimea.

And the best part is (in my version of events) all those people who performed national service would qualify for TriCare and the GI Bill, so we don't even need new programs. It won't be easy, of course, but it gives our youth skills in higher education and trades, helps alleviate the housing crisis, improves American infrastructure, and invests in our future.

I'd also like to see some sort of UBI after the service ends to catch anyone who still struggles after but I expect that'd be relatively rare.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I mean, what you're describing FDRs "New Deal" something modern progressives are tying to bring back but republicans and "moderates" won't let happen...

Our infrastructure is crumbling because after FDR built it from the New Deal, we just stopped doing all that scary socialism.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Miller believes a standardized test at the high school level, called the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, should be administered to all students to help funnel potential recruits into positions within the military, based on their skills and intellect levels.

Let me take a wild guess which people would get "funneled into positions" as officers, and who would end up as ~~fodder~~ infantry.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People going officer usually already know they're going officer either because they're in ROTC/JROTC or already have a plan for college. The poors are generally the ones that end up enlisted because they have fewer options. This is already the case.

So your wild guess would have probably been spot on. Required service just means they'll have extra poors.

I was in the nuclear power program in the Navy. They're some of the smartest people I've ever worked with. It was the first time I was the dumbest guy in the room and, let me tell you, that'll humble you very quickly. So they're definitely not trying to make the smartest people officers because, while the officers there were fine, they had nothing on some of these guys.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Oh, sure - I knew I was going to get that technically wrong. I was trying to use the least number of words to express that it would be quite simple to use this kind of thing to put the "right" people in charge of decision-making, and the "wrong" people into deadly combat situations, or at the very least, into positions lowly enough that they can be systematically conditioned to stifle their own political will.

"Right" and "wrong" above can certainly mean stupid shit like "skin color" or "ethnicity," but I was actually thinking about it in terms of political ideology. Dead people can't vote.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Everyone in my school had to take the ASVAB. It was a complete waste of time. Hell, I just filled in bubbles at random because I had no interest in dying in Iraq and didn't care if I passed the test. Unfortunately, I passed the test and got so many calls from recruiters for years.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago

On the bright side, this should alienate young voters.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Fuck that. I want to see people do one year of mandatory customer-facing retail work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Totally agree. Retail, food service or phone operator, the 3 branches, must pick one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

This makes sense. Those positions are considered ESSENTIAL after all. Especially for the wealthy business owners who rake in profit from others doing these jobs. You want to run a business like that? Learn what your work force has to put up with. Shit, I'd make them do it for 4 years like military service.

Maybe these ultra wealthy people would actually become human again instead of being empty voids that suck up an entire economy's worth of money and then just hoard it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wait so we want to make abortion illegal, divorce illegal, reduce ability to get contraception, and enstate mandatory conscription.

Ah. It makes sense now.

Military enrollment numbers must be low.

Checks

Mhm. Very.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Good, I look forward to seeing Baron in uniform.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago

Hereditary bone spurs and affluenza will be valid medical excuses for avoiding mandatory military service. That or a big bag of money with a dollar sign on it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

You should stop thinking anything they implement is going to be fair and hurt them in any way. They don't mind being hypocrites at all.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For the poor children.

Not their own I imagine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Exactly, none of them would ever want this. I will never understand taking a position on something where I don't immediately put myself in that position first. People suck...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Stephen Miller in greens.

Voted most likely to be shot in the back by his own side.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s arrogance and stupidity all the way down. Enjoy your ride republiQans. Please eat a lot more horse de-wormer while you’re at it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

They've moved from horse pills to raw milk.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Strap up billionaires, it's time to sacrifice for your country!

If the 1% didn't want to be on the front line, maybe they shouldn't have purchased the government

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

If Trump goes first. I’m down.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Instead of making it mandatory why not make it mandatory if u wanna run for office or own a gun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Service guarantees your constitutional rights!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Actually thats how it used to be they then amended the second amendment and got rid of the service requirement hence ur problems.