this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
239 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans on the House Small Business Committee pressed Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm on Thursday for answers on proposed energy-efficiency standards for ceiling fans.

The proposed standards were first published in the Federal Register in June, and the comment period closed earlier this week. According to the Energy Department, the rule as applied to standard residential ceiling fans would cut fan-related electricity costs by about 40 percent relative to the least efficient fans currently available.

The House panel presented the rules as burdensome to ceiling fan manufacturers, particularly smaller ones.

“This proposed rule would decrease the maximum estimated energy consumption permissible for large diameter and belt driven ceiling fans,” committee Republicans wrote. “This rule would require numerous small business fan manufacturers to redesign their products and may put between 10 and 30 percent of small business ceiling fan manufacturers out of business. It appears that the Department of Energy may not have properly considered small entities during this rulemaking process.”

An Energy Department spokesperson told The Hill this aspect has been mischaracterized, saying in an email that the one-time total conversion cost would be about $107 million for all manufacturers.

“The incremental cost to consumers is $86.6 million annually, while the operating cost savings are $281 million annually — both at a 7 percent discount rate,” the spokesperson said. “The savings are more than triple the incremental costs.”

The spokesperson noted the standards, “which are required by Congress,” would not be in effect for five years and would save Americans “up to $369 million per year, while substantially reducing harmful air pollution — a crucial fact that some have conveniently failed to mention.”

Efficiency standards for home appliances have become culture war flashpoints under the Biden administration. The administration has restored a number of efficiency rules rolled back under the Trump administration, including for shower heads, water heaters and gas furnaces.

The most umbrage, however, has been reserved for efficiency regulations over gas stoves, beginning last year when Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. approved a request for information on hazards associated with the devices, which the CPSC formalized in March. Although Trumka has said there are no plans to ban gas stoves, House Republicans have introduced formal legislation this year to legally prevent such a ban.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Now they’re triggered by ceiling fans. You can’t make this shit up

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago

Republicans have absolutely destroyed the satire industry.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"hahaha, fan beats man!"

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The new standard is based on cubic feet of air moved per minute per watt. It's honestly pretty thoughtful in its implementation. I was expecting to see it was just some watt cap on products, but that's not what it is at all; you can still make very powerful fans, they just need to actually be moving meaningful amounts of air.

The main people hurt by a rule change like this will be import brand piece of shit fans that don't blow air and prey on vulnerable consumers. I doubt there is even one single US firm that will be negatively affected by this rule change because the cost of US manufacturing is WAY too high to be selling these dollar store fan products.

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/ceiling-fans-ecs-nopr.pdf

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would like them to be required to prominently display their power consumption. I feel like every other household appliance I own makes their energy consumption fairly clear, but I have no idea what kind of energy my fans use. Like it's probably more efficient to turn on every fan in my house all day rather than turn on my AC, but I have no idea if that's true.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can confirm, was shopping for ceiling fans and finding the cfm per power on different power levels was a pain in the arse.

Should be part of Energy Star like other appliances.

As it was I had to search for DC and/or ECM motor fans and go from there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a good way to make sure fan manufacturers aren't putting misleading labels on their fans. Like "Powerful 800W FAN" on the front in big letters but a low CFM rating on a label on the back, if at all.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (32 children)

Crocodile tears. Republicans don’t care about small businesses. This is just a “Democrats want this? Gotta fight it!” moment, because they have no actual platform.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re contrarians. They don’t stand for anything except the opposite of the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s the most baffling thing to me when I see so many grown ass adults buying into these cults of personality. Like…what the fuck does your candidate propose to actually do? Just screaming and throwing tantrums like a toddler, and that’s the guy you cast your vote for? I don’t get it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Their campaigns are always based on fear and hate of some imagined group or perceived enemy.a lot of these people have also been trained by birth by religious groups to conform to the tribe and to have blind obedience to their leaders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They’ll clutch at anything they think they might be able to use to piss off their constituents, won’t they?

“They’re coming for you gas stoves, citizen! Where will it end? What will you cook food for your family on?! Pic up a ‘don’t step on the gas’ ballcap for only $49.99, and go get ‘em!”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember people hording incandescent light bulbs when those were restricted?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At this point I can't even fathom wanting an incandescent bulb.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember when some of the first LED bulbs hit the market, I replaced every bulb in my room (still living at home at my parents' house) and never looked back.

Back then it cost like $20 a bulb, didn't care.

The lights in my ceiling fan had a tendency to burn out frequently, never could identify a reason why after plenty of troubleshooting, but it incandescent bulbs did not like that fan.

Pretty sure those same bulbs are still in there like 15 years later.

Also my room was always the hottest in the house, and I was willing to try anything to shave off a couple of degrees. I never stuck a thermometer in there to measure it, so it could have been a placebo effect, but it certainly seemed like it maybe knocked a degree or two off the temperature to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is this actually a concern? Having legislation rolled out to force new and better technology to reach the market, thus causing systemic savings of energy and money?

The way it's written it's as if the consumer is forced to go get a new ceiling fan or gas stove the moment the new ones land in the market.

And if some small manufacturers go bust, that means room for others to appear.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It’s either this or they actually work on actual policy

So yeah, this is a concern for those fascists

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

It's always supposedly about protecting the little guy, the small business person. While also, just coincidentally mind you, also protecting mega corporations that bankroll the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

small business fan manufacturers

Is this really a thing? Small businesses that manufacture fans?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There are niche manufacturers in many industries. I wouldn’t be surprised. Particularly for super high-end residential products.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

With how the rule is written, I would be shocked if anything other than bargain basement import brands were affected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No, it's just that republicans hate democrats.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Funny how Conservatives get so upset about conserving resources.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The roster of Republicans who signed the letter:

The House committee’s letter was signed by Chairman Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas), as well as Reps. Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas), Maria Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), Aaron Bean (R-Fla.) and Jake Ellzey (R-Texas).

FL & TX ffs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile ERCOT is asking people in Texas to conserve power damn near daily at this point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans don’t care if you can’t use your fans, they only care that you keep buying them.

We are only consumers to feed corporate profits in their equations.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're all made in China/Philippines. Even the US brands like Vornado and Dyson.

Republicans want to export dollars to East Asia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Maria Elvira Salazar

Mfing Harry Potter villain name how could anyone expect any different?

load more comments
view more: next ›