165
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14827116

South Korean military set to ban iPhones over ‘security’ concerns

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago

Makes sense, to be honest. China, Korea, Russia, and the USA are some of the few countries with the ability to vet phones from local companies. You don't want your military being dependent on foreign companies, especially if those foreign companies may be subjected to infiltration or secret orders.

The USA has been shown to spy on its allies, so if I were the head of a military in a country that produced its own phones, I would ban iPhones in the military too. Most countries don't have this luxury, unfortunately.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago

We're in dire need of FOSS ecosystem for phones!

[-] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

Why the quotes? It's closed source = it's a security concern. What I hope is that they do make or contribute to an opensource secure phone project. Would be great if it were a linux phone.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why the quotes?

If you ever see quotation marks in a headline, it simply means they're attributing the word/phrase to a particular source. In this case, they're saying that the word "security" was used verbatim in the intranet document. Scare quotes are never used in journalism, so they're not implying anything by putting the word in quotation marks. They're simply saying that they're not paraphrasing.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for explaining that.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Their security concern is that iPhones won’t let a third party app take control of phone capabilities at a very low level. They want to use an in-house app to stop people from recording audio or video based I assume from the article on geofencing.

The way you’d do that with iPhones is most likely through mdm.

It’s not that iPhones aren’t secure, it’s that the rok military can’t control them with its spyware.

Reading between the lines, it’s not like no one knows that. It’s a good opportunity to gently suggest people working in high security positions (who make higher grade salaries on average!) ditch their iPhones for Samsung models. No need to run a mdm shop and you juice a national company.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

It’s not that iPhones aren’t secure, it’s that the rok military can’t control them with its spyware.

How is MDM not classified as spyware when the military wants to have the same or deeper level of control?

Reading between the lines, it’s not like no one knows that. It’s a good opportunity to gently suggest people working in high security positions (who make higher grade salaries on average!) ditch their iPhones for Samsung models. No need to run a mdm shop and you juice a national company.

Well, it makes sense, doesn't it? Relying on closed source stuff from other nations, especially nations known for spying (after Snowden there's no denying that), isn't exactly secure.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I guess a person could claim mdm is spyware, but by extension group policy and maybe even selinux would fall in the same category.

It’s worth keeping in mind that the distinction is made in comparison to actual software separate from the os that is being used to keep tabs on the device location and gate access to hardware. Possibly one of the most literal types of spyware I’ve ever seen.

We should also recognize that Samsung isn’t shipping fully open stock roms and the open or closed source nature of software coming from a company headquartered in an ally’s territory doesn’t matter near as much as their military presence on rok soil.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Seems everyone jumped to conclusions about this article.

Yes, iPhones are blocked because they lack security. This is military, so they aren't worried about basic malware. They are worried about government level security issues (Pegasus, etc...). And let's be blunt, on this level, Apple keeps showing that they lack security in the real world situations. Yet the latest of a long list of iPhones being targeted and hacked.

Now, where people seem to be badly jumping to conclusions is that the article points out that "many" devices will be banned, so no, I doubt the latest Samsung Galaxy phone will be allowed. They are most likely going to require people use a Samsung Tactical Edition smartphone. These are designed for military usage and prevent phones from being secretly turned on for recording private conversations by hacks like Pegasus. These phones have been around for a few years now, and have likely been thoroughly tested and approved now.

This isn't some knee-jerk patriotic requirement, but a real understanding of what is and isn't a secure device, combined with the fact that Korea has to deal with a more and more aggressive China. They need real security for real world military.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

SEOUL - South Korea’s military is considering a comprehensive ban on iPhones in military buildings due to increasing concerns about possible leaks of sensitive information through voice recordings, according to multiple sources on April 23.

The sources, a group of ranking officers who wished to speak on condition of anonymity, said that the Air Force headquarters released an internal announcement on the military’s intranet server on April 11, instructing a complete prohibition on any device capable of voice recording and which does not permit third-party apps to control inherent functions, effective June 1, with iPhones cited as items subject to the ban.

According to the document, the decision to ban iPhones in the military came from joint meetings held by the headquarters of the army, navy and air force, located at Gyeryongdae in South Chungcheong province.

The document was quoted as stating: “It’s inevitable to block any kind of voice recording, not just formal communications including meetings, office conversations, business announcements and complaints from and consultations with the public, but also informal communications such as private phone calls (within military buildings).”

According to the document, “there has been an ongoing review regarding the potential extension of this ban to all subordinate units”, with the army headquarters having conducted a trial of the ban since April. If the ban is extended, it will likely go beyond the Gyeryongdae area to include all other units across the nation.

The devices set to be prohibited include all types of smartwatches and wearable devices as well.

Currently, about 10,000 personnel, including some 6,000 officers, are estimated to be on duty at the Gyeryongdae defence centre alone. For security reasons, the exact number is not disclosed to the public.

The specific type of security threat they’re talking about is the threat of “our in-house software can’t control iphones”.

I may be misremembering, but under ios I think that goal is accomplished with mdm instead of an app?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Huh. Where do they make the Samsung phones again?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I mean even the President doesn't use an iPhone, he probably still uses one of those General Dynamics bricks.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
165 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

33047 readers
553 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS