this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If the leaks and rumors are true, Beijing stands ready to launch a new and radical solution to the economy’s property crisis – a government takeover. What the authorities refer to as “a new model” would replace the old emphasis on ownership with more rentals and use government funds to buy up bankrupt properties so that in time the government’s role in real estate would rise from 5% of the market at present to 30%. Such an act would surely take the nation back to its communist roots if not quite the days of Mao Zedong. If it would veil the property crisis for a time, it would in the long run do tremendous damage to China’s economic prospects.

xi-peel

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Beijing’s ability to manage real estate also comes into question after considering how poorly the authorities have managed things to date. Prior to 2020, Beijing actively encouraged residential real estate development, pushing local authorities to get involved and ensuring easy credit terms for both developers and homebuyers. Private builders and speculators responded actively, taking on debt and pursuing increasingly dubious projects so that even as China was meeting its housing needs, such development reached the astronomical level of some 30% of China’s economy. Then in 2020, Beijing abruptly removed all this support. Not surprisingly, the highly leveraged and extended developers began failing almost immediately.

xi-lib-tears oh no! not the speculators! it would be a real shame if a bunch of capitalists lost tons of money and all we got out of it was all this housing that now we can buy up for cheap!

[–] [email protected] 72 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Since US prices are so high, they were salivating at a Chinese housing crisis. That way they could enter the Chinese market and buy up properties for cheap. But since the government is going to buy up the cheap homes, they can't enter the market. So now comes the propaganda tantrum about how there's no way this will work, it's evil, it's authoritarian.

Problem is that shit only works on Americans. Appealing to Chinese people's sens of individualistic English property rights doesn't really work.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

you nailed it

also forbes about u.s. commercial real estate:

Finally, while it will be a tough year or two for the commercial real estate community, I expect the amount of capital on the sidelines will open up the market and create once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. As the old adage goes in real estate, "It is not the first or second but the third owner who makes money on a project." The opportunities will be plentiful, but the buyers will have to view the assets through a new lens.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Since US prices are so high, they were salivating at a Chinese housing crisis. That way they could enter the Chinese market and buy up properties for cheap. But since the government is going to buy up the cheap homes, they can't enter the market.

Incompetent Chinese property developer: "I consent!"

Soulless American hedge fund: "I consent!"

The Communist Party of China: "Was there somebody you forgot to ask?"

The myth of consensual market entry.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Prior to 2020, Beijing actively encouraged residential real estate development. . . [Developers persued] increasingly dubious projects so that even as China was meeting its housing needs. . . Then in 2020, Beijing abruptly removed all this support.

So they funded housing development until there were plenty of houses at which point they stopped funding more development and this is bad for some reason? What did they want them to do, continue encouraging development when there wasn't a need for it solely to prop up the investors?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago

What did they want them to do, continue encouraging development when there wasn't a need for it solely to prop up the investors?

Unironically yes. Liberalism is crazy

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they had done that, then we could get more of the stories about the ghost cities that are the harbinger of China's imminent collapse. I've been reading those articles for decades. They've kept a lot of journalists busy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Imagine taking a city’s population growth chart, extrapolating the data out 5 years, and including the projected need to housing in your 5 year plan. These damn commies are way too prepared for predictable trends. Suspicious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

Won't somebody think of the line!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

gives capitalists the money and leniency to build a bunch of housing

abruptly yoinks it from them after they’re built and tell them to fuck off

subsidize the housing so people can live in it

suswcc problem?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the leaks and rumors are true, Beijing stands ready to launch a new and radical solution to the economy’s property crisis – a government takeover.

Leaks and rumours?

Isn't it what they said they would do ages ago?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago

No but see we can't trust anything China's government says it's going to do even though it has a long and storied history of doing literally exactly what it says it's going to do because ... reasons? I guess? So we can only trust anonymous sources instead.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 8 months ago

xigma-male There is no 'property crisis', its made up by the market.

When 2008 housing bubble burst, the problem wasn't that the homes magically vanished, the homes remained, taken over by ghouls and leaving the individuals with debt which wasn't wiped off clean.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 8 months ago

did-someone Oh, did someone get addicted to property speculation?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It would be really, really hilarious if China did a communism and it saved their economy

[–] [email protected] 55 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It has happened before.

It is happening now.

It will happen again.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It will happen again.

some-controversy what if it didn't need to?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ok but what if he pressed the communism button? xi-plz

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Tapping the sign

According to Marx's theory of historical materialism, societies pass through six stages — primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and finally global, stateless communism.

Don't hold your breath

[–] [email protected] 63 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This dude has written at least 9 China bad articles in the last month.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

~~getting some of this probably. wonder if a FOIA would be able to find out where it all goes~~

(a) Countering Chinese influence fund. —There is authorized to be appropriated $300,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025 for the Countering Chinese Influence Fund to counter the malign influence of the Chinese Communist Party globally. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this authorization are authorized to remain available until expended and shall supplement, not supplant, amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to counter such influence.

EDIT: apparently this money passed the senate but never actually became law. my apologies

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We need to create an organization and start requesting funds from this and pump out a bunch of “china is bad because it gives housing for low prices” articles

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

sorry it looks like I was misinformed. the money passed the senate, but didn't make it into the CHIPS and Science act which is the one that actually got signed by Genocide Joe

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Is this actually in effect?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

~~the law passed, yeah~~

it looks like this house bill did not advance, but another bill, the Strategic Competition Act of 2021, contained the same $300 million annual funding

despite the reporting here saying it passed, I can't find confirmation of that on the congress.gov page for it. I'm not familiar enough yet with the legislative databases to read these tea leaves.

EDIT: okay this was quite a rabbit hole, it became the Innovation and Competition Act, which did contain the 300m language, which passed but did not become law. the one that did become law is called the CHIPS and Science act, and so far I do not see the 300m to counter Chinese influence money in it. well, shit. I really thought it was law but it just passed the Senate looks like. my apologies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago

It’s hard being American and realizing your government doesn’t give a shit about you and spends all its resources committing genocide

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Lmao I thought the title was just the OP dunking on Forbes, but it's the actual article title, this is beyond parody

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

You (Foolishly) assumed they couldn't be so arrogant.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is my dream result for the YIMBY movement. Dense infill housing built in all cities and then immediately expropriated.

Also it's very funny that 30% publicly-owned housing is communist when I'm pretty sure Singapore has a much higher percentage.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Yeah I think the "free" capitalist Singapore has like 78% of their population living in public housing...yet you don't see these fascists fearmongering about how Singapore is "foolish" and "communist" for doing so.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

use government funds to buy up bankrupt properties so that in time the government’s role in real estate would rise from 5% of the market at present to 30%

We should let unused, bankrupt property be repo’d by banks so they can use it to gamble on doge coin

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

If housing shouldn't be a commodity, then why is it so lucrative under capitalism? Checkmate leftists

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago

Lmao, what "crisis"? That there's a surplus of housing and people are easily able to afford to live? This is what only being able to see things through the lens of profit does to a mf.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Except China’s not gonna be maintaining private ownership or redlining ethnic minorities out of said ownership

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is journalism? With these writing standards you may as well hire a sixteen year-old for $7.25 an hour.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

I could do better and I hate writing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

Liberals critiquing Marxism: “Fear not, for Don Quixote has come to relieve you of your delusions! Those aren’t windmills you’re seeing, you utter fucking morons, they’re giants! Wake up sheeple!”

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

A big step in the right direction, but let's be real, this is basically just Keynesianism

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

They can't keep getting away with being COMMUNISTS!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So glad they could tell us what to think of China's plans (foolish) rather than just do their damn jobs and just report the damn news and save their opinions for their damn blog.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

It reeks of cope

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Their job is to add the negative twist.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

When Forbes accidentally gives Xi leftist street cred.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago

think-about-it If you have the resources you can decide to just build houses and cut out the speculators. Also, power comes from the barrel of a gun.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

load more comments
view more: next ›