emizeko

:fry:

[aimixin answers a similar question in r/genzedong]

Saying Marxism isn't about morality or excludes morality isn't meant to say Marxists are immoral or amoral. It's sort like, computer science doesn't talk about morality, but that doesn't make computer science immoral, or software developers amoral. They're just separate topics.

Marxism is meant to treat socioeconomic development as a material science. Biology and chemistry can inform doctors on how to make medicine and what medicine to prescribe people. But biology and chemistry themselves do not prescribe anything. Prescriptions require some sort of stated end goal, which is subjective.

Stalin says something similar in Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR, where he points out that political economy is the study of objective laws of social development which are outside of the control of the government, that the government's policies are not equivalent to political economy as a science but are prescriptions informed by the science.

This is what Marx had to say on the subject.

Communists do not oppose egoism to selflessness or selflessness to egoism, nor do they express this contradiction theoretically either in its sentimental or in its highflown ideological form; they rather demonstrate its material source, with which it disappears of itself. The Communists do not preach morality at all.

They do not put to people the moral demand: love one another, do not be egoists, etc.; on the contrary, they are very well aware that egoism, just as much selflessness, is in definite circumstances a necessary form of the self-assertion of individuals. Hence, the Communists by no means want to do away with the "private individual" for the sake of the "general", selfless man. That is a statement of the imagination.

—Marx, The German Ideology

In some sense, you can argue there is a Marxist morality, but not from the perspective of subjective prescriptions, but merely an attempt to explain an objective origin to already existing morality. Such as, the origin of liberal viewpoints, which are heavily steeped in morality, clearly emanate from the capitalist mode of production. One could also argue a socialist society would produce a different kind of morality, but this would not be a prescription but would have to be demonstrated with evidence.

I don't think there is any reason to try and force morality or ethics into Marxism. Marxism does not need to be some all-encompassing worldview. It's fine to get your beliefs and views from other sources. I am influenced by many writers, many of whom are not Marxist. I don't get all my ideas from one source, I don't feel a need to somehow make Marxism all-encompassing.

it sucks but turns out they will not let you board a plane with a parachute [emoji of steaming mad smiley face here]

what does ROC stand for here

the only half-decent execution of this I can think of is Datsun becoming Nissan

it will always be twitter and I will continue to mock anyone who tries to call it "x" by feigning ignorance and asking if they're talking about some porn site

Paul Robeson was an amazing guy

you might like the book even more, check it out. I read it and the two books that follow it before I saw the movie and they have a really unique atmosphere

functionally it feels a lot like the Two-Minutes Hate from JorJor Wells' 9084, ritual affirmation of in-group loyalty by demonizing the enemy

EDIT: also can't help but be reminded of False Witnesses

sorry you're having a rough day. i wish we could be friends. I would get you a (cw: dairy) milkshake and we could complain about stuff togheter