this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago

aka "it worked". conservatives successfully fucked over black people, again

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just as the Founding Fathers intended.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mind you, we amended the constitution to fix that issue

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean the 13th? Nah, that still allows for punitive slavery, which is the norm to this day.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

13, 14, and 15 in combination. The 13th is definitely imperfect, but the others, backed by a sane court, would make a huge difference.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Could have passed the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, but as with all things, Democrats considered the filibuster more important.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

More exactly, a tiny number of Democrats regarded it as more important, and without them, the rest didn't have the ability to pass anything

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

More exactly, a tiny number of Democrats regarded it as more important

There's always just enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Not always.

That's how we passed the Inflation Reduction Act, which is the biggest piece of climate legislation in US history.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They didn't end the filibuster for that. The filibuster is still right there, making damned sure civil rights are limited to only what Republicans will allow. But your attempt to deflect to the consolation prize for Democrats killing BBB without so much as a vote is noted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Which is exactly what the Republicans wanted.