[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Only if being spent to benefit billionaries and large corporations. /s

11
submitted 7 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6942679

The World Weather Attribution analysis the article is about can be found here

18
submitted 7 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The World Weather Attribution analysis the article is about can be found here

113
submitted 9 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Stealing the specimens would as a practical matter simply destroy the collection. It's not a useful approach

71
submitted 11 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

We haven't won yet, but that doesn't mean we can't.

43
submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35
submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
46
submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Title comes from the email subject line on this newsletter. It doesn't yet appear to have been published on the main nytimes.com website

62
submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

There are a lot more regular people than billionaires. If we work together, we can set policy and enact laws in much of the world. And that lets us control the behavior of the wealthiest.

23
submitted 14 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
26
submitted 15 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 19 points 16 hours ago

Oil, hate, and corruption

183
submitted 18 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

No, they're ruminants, with similar methane-producing bacteria in their digestive systems.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

They're not up for election; Supreme Court justices have lifetime appointments. It's just part of their bigger agenda of ending the use of regulation in any way that benefits people instead of corporations.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

We actually have a constitutional amendment barring insurrectionists like him from being President, but the Supreme Court is likely to side with him because most of the justices want a far right dictatorship.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

Rich asshole: see, they keep eating beef. Why should I change.

Reality: we all do

[-] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago

What's important here is that the lower bills would have paid for the higher mortgage. But this wouldn't benefit the homebuilders, so they fought it

[-] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago

The less animal the better, but a shift away from beef and lamb is a start, and it's something that in the US, relatively few people realize has an impact.

view more: next ›

silence7

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF