this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
127 points (92.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Idaho state representative wants to build out the state’s law against cannibalism over fears that the composting of human remains could lead to humans consuming other humans.

Republican Heather Scott floated a bill on Thursday that would make it illegal to serve “the flesh and blood of another human being” to someone who does not know or consent to it, The Idaho Statesman reports. Idaho already outlaws cannibalism and is the only state to do so, even though other states have laws that punish abuse of corpses.

Human composting is legal in some states because it can be more eco-friendly than other methods like cremation. But rather than target composting, which would require a rewrite of rules for morticians, Scott figured it would be easier to expand the cannibalism law.

She was apparently inspired by a clip from a prank TV show she had seen, in which personalities pretended to feed people human flesh in sausage links. “They didn’t tell the people, they fed it to them,” she told the Statesman.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, honestly, the only thing standing between me and cannibalism are some local regulations.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I had a friend in college who always said " The worst thing I could say is that I'd kill you and not eat you." Somehow this was endearing and disturbing all at once. I do hope she's doing well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I hope we all have someone out there who thinks of us with this level of genuine fondness precisely because of how weird we are.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

if you're not going to eat me at least ~~fuck me~~ do a Weekend at Bernie's

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Personally I practice catch and release. Much more ethical.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She was inspired by a fictional TV prank show she watched. WHAT THE FUCK

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Welcome to the hell of living alongside the Republican Party. Don't try to make it make sense, you'll only hurt yourself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I literally went crazy trying to make sense of everything when I was younger. I’m hopping in twenty more years I- tidal collapse? Never mind then.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How fucking stupid can someone be?

BY CITING A TRU TV SCRIPTED “PRANK” AS REASON TO WASTE TIME AND MONEY ON SHIT LIKE THIS.

The fuck dude. The fuck.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

This message brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do republican politicians always oppose the greener option? This doesn’t even threaten oil interests.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The greener option almost always represents change. The funeral business is very large, and probably one of the least ethical businesses around. They take advantage of grieving people and charge them way too much money to be filles with preservatives and stuck in the ground. It's a big business, and change is bad for existing business, though it'll create all new businesses that take advantage of those people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

In fact, if this lawmaker was being paid by some funeral industry lobby, I wouldn't be even a little surprised.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

Knowing Republicans, Heather Scott has been craving some strange meat.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Oh Idaho, the Florida of the PNW

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well if that’s true then 99%+ of people are cannibals lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

100%. Even the ones who aren't breast-fed (which is sort of cannibalism if you think about it).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Dear god don't put ideas into their heads

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean the only issue I can think of with human composting is maybe potential prison diseases if the compost is used to farm food.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The risk of prion diseases are low. Prions are proteins and do biodegrade. The product of composting is dirt, which we -normally- don't eat, which lowers the risk even lower.

This Canadian study found a low risk of BSE (aka mad cow disease) after composting BSE infected biomaterials. They concluded that it's a viable option for disposal of such waste.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't want low risk. I want no risk.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I at least want the risk quantified better than "low". Just how low?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

This is me, a reasonable normal human person, expecting something useful to be said by a republiQan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As long as it remains legal for me to eat my leg if I ever need it amputated, I'm fine with it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I want the skin of mine as the binding of a book. And the contents of the book will be a novel I commission about the amputation of my leg.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

So I guess the obvious conclusion is that she considers compost delicious? Why else would she make that connection?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

as long as my good donor organs are already put to good use i don't fucking care which organisms break my body down.

but also this is a republican lawmaker lying stupidly, which is the core skill set for that job

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

guess it could protect from prions