Just like how all IT infrastructure in the world is 150 furries and if one of them gets sick youtube goes down.
games
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
-
3rd International Volunteer Brigade (Hexbear gaming discord)
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
At one point seven wizards held the seven keys to the internet and if their keys were all combined they could turn off the internet.
Palworld is such a gloriously satisfying clusterfuck to watch. Just bizzare "the god's love idiots and fools" ridiculous shit all the way around.
That bit from the English version of "The IT Crowd" where Jen's gotta go give a speech in front a bunch of big wigs and Moss and Roy give her a box and tell her "this... this is the internet. All of it, right here. Be very careful with it."
If you want to seriously destroy the worlds infrastructure, attacking Midwest FurFest will do more damage than blowing up any pipeline or cutting any wire could possibility do.
Explaining what a Furry convention is to my Houthi homies.
LOL
That was attempted in 2014.
Source
I was there.
IIRC, There was also a thing last year which took out someone's insulin pump.
Yeah, it's gotten so big it's hard to get a hotel so I didn't go, but I heard from friends. Someone was probably using a flipper or some other device with an antenna booster to disrupt Bluetooth signal.
are furries the bourgeosie?
The furrgeosie if you will
for, allegedly, a 40 person company? yeah one guy for the networking sounds about right
I have no clue what palworld is, but this sounds like a shit show.
Hopefully this kid is getting his.
Its incredible this ragtag group of people managed to produce a game that runs so much better than its contemporary games. Like compare it to Ark, and for godsakes, the ARK 'Remaster' which is somehow worse than the original. Ark had like 10 years to optimize and they can't get it done.
I read something online the other day that said Ark, fully installed with all the official maps and content, no mods is half a damn terabyte of data and (unsurprisingly), it runs poorly.
475k per month plus one dude's salary honestly sounds relatively cost effective for a game with 1 to 2 million daily players, but then again, I'm not a game dev.
And the daily player numbers will die down over time while Microsoft helps them cope with the overly successful launch.
I think this is just inaccurate though. There's no chance there's one IT guy for a team working on a multiplayer online game.
Japan can't into IT
People don't know how true this is. Its not just "hur hur fax machines". It's "the file size limit for this upload is 1mb. If you need more, please write us a letter and post it to us so that we can assign more space to you."
If you need more, please write us a letter
Correction. "Send us a Fax" is more accurate.
This one was a real experience and they wanted me to post them a letter. I wish I could have sent a fax.
Massive pain in the NEC.
Japanese business leadership is like if your parents who can’t rotate pdfs had every single notable position and refused to listen to your advice to just click the fucking counter/clockwise arrows because you got a little too angry with them when they called you for said advice
the Palworld multiplayer limit is up to 32 players
Is this a joke?
When Planetside 2 came out 12 years ago, I was looking forward to a new future of 1000+ player games.
Nope.
Sure, but Planetside 2:
- Was specifically designed with that goal in mind
- Still runs like shit with loads of people
I loved seeing my old computer barely hold on for dear life as the Ghosts of the Revolution marched across an entire map in the original Planetside
Probably had more than one guy as well
I played it again a few years ago and it runs much worse than it did at launch
I think all their talent from that time left (probably fired) anyway
To be fair, networking is hellish for a variety of reasons.
I took 1 networking (IT midtier elective) class in college as an elective and even though it was super basic in reality, it was very annoying in that nothing felt automatic, even though 99.9% of everything felt like there should be. Usually if that's the case I'd learn/be told there was some automatic stuff (Take a compiler class -> learn of YACC and they you never write your own compiler). But networking? Not really as far as I've ever seen. Sure there's some stuff, but it always seems to come around to "This works except when you need to know the exact details of https once a year".
Ironically I'm on the interconnect team at my current work. Even though we rely on shit, we avoid touching 90% of the stuff we own that actually does the connecting, and avoid setting up crap because its a mess.
To be fair, networking is hellish for a variety of reasons.
That has nothing to do with it. My company maintains network software for server instances which maintain thousands of simultaneous user connections continuously (and loads of continuous bandwidth). Simple "networking is tough" is not an answer for why it apparently costs this company half-a-mill a month to maintain 32 active connections. There is no good answer to that. It's just poor management/bureaucracy, including their choice of infrastructure. And labor, obviously.
Yeah networking is fucking insane, like
How are there so many problems that can be fixed by figuring out how to log into a router and then telling it "1.1.1.1" instead of "0.0.0.0."
Like my fucking graphics card doesn't shut off periodically and go "oh damn should I try ones? Or maybe twos? Pleas tell me a number so I can turn back on again
-
Hope he is demanding an obscene salary also, given he is the only thing keeping that server running. I wouldn't do it for less than 300k/yr, probably closer to 400k.
-
The cloud is a scam, its just someone else's computer. If you're a smallish company you're going to be better off in the long run investing in your own hardware and some well paid people that can maintain it. At a certain point it gets harder to scale, but at that point you'll be rolling in the dough if you played your cards right.
I have a feeling that.. uh. No. There are more people involved at that company.
made by a single man