197
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The settlement is the FTC’s first ban on selling sensitive location data.

The Biden administration stopped a company from selling data on people’s medical visits on Tuesday, its first settlement on a privacy issue that has many Americans concerned about who can see their most sensitive personal data — particularly visits to abortion providers.

After an investigation, the Federal Trade Commission said it had reached a settlement with Outlogic, a location data broker formerly known as X-Mode Social, which had been collecting information on people’s visits to medical centers.

The settlement is the first major enforcement on location data since a 2022 executive order directed the government to ramp up privacy protections for anyone seeking an abortion.

The FTC has been cracking down on health privacy violations after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled there is no constitutional right to an abortion when it overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. A Biden executive order in July 2022 directed federal agencies to protect people’s privacy related to reproductive health care services.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

The Markup found that the data broker was receiving location data from the family-tracking app Life360 as well as dating apps for the LGBTQ community.

Real shame that they'll publicly shame Life360, but not the dating apps selling our their customers. I'm going to assume it's grindr since it's the biggest name that I'm aware of, and surprisingly isn't owned by match group who I was going to throw under the bus.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Wasn't that already illegal due to HIPAA?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

I don't think location data from your cellphone is protected by HIPPA.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

You would really think so right? At this point I’m curious WTF it’s good for.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

This is not the function of HIPAA exactly. HIPAA is primarily used as a way to regulate the sharing of health information, and provides very specific requirements for the sharing of health information, with many caveats.

HIPAA specifically targets healthcare providers (covered entities) and the third-parties (Business Associates) which they work with. More specifically, it provides requirements for the sharing and storage of data from a covered entity to a business associate, and establishes liability in the event of a data compromise for either party.

If the data did not originate from a healthcare provider, likely HIPAA does not apply.

In this instance, the applications identified as sharing the data are not covered entities or even business associates.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It doesn't contain actual medical data, but a court might be able to conclude that your whereabouts might be protected data from a health privacy perspective.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Lina Khan is a rare human being

[-] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

The US government: Winning where it can for the last 100 years… 🥱

[-] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Remember the CAN-SPAM act and how it ended spam forever? Remember how the national Do Not Call registry stopped telemarketing calls once and for all?

Yeah, this is going to do nothing at all.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
197 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3293 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS