Yep! Nailed it.
MotoAsh
No, boycotts are not a corporate death knell. No one is saying that. LITERALLY no one is saying their personal decision or reasoning is the cause of this news.
EVERYONE ks pkinting at shitty things Ubisoft does, says, it caused them to not bjy it and likely is impacting others' decisions... then you come along going, "NUHUH NUHUH, Ubisoft isn't losing money because YOU didn't buy it!"
My dude... we FUCKING KNOW THAT!! We're saying UBISOFT shot themselves in the foot with shitty behavior. This article is literally about the effects of people not buying en masse, and you're saying that the NEWS WE ARE READING is not possible...
Just stop. Just stop. Boycotts most often do not work, but THIS IS NOT A BOYCOTT!! This is people explaining why they stopped giving Ubisoft money. Holy fuck, you are good at doubling down on a bad idea.
"lolol see?! They don't even know! They're making things up to scare us!"
- actual brainwashed moron
The irony of you constantly telling people they don't actually know why they do not pay Ubisoft...
My dude... We're TELLING YOU why we aren't buying it. You're just too dumb and stubborn to accept the truth. Obstinance makes you pathetic, not correct.
OK ape man.
Musk shittiness is a high bar.
No, a dove is not 'a' pigeon. A dove is in the pigeon family. Your cousin is NOT your brother ... because they're not your brother.
They may have been condescending (quoting a mildly modified copypasta they linked), but the explanation is very clear until the end. Do not insult knowledge simply because you were called wrong. That is beyond pathetic and insults knowledge itself.
After you put your pants back on.
This means nothing towards the legality of acquiring things that can no longer be legally purchased. It just means you won't be downloading a Mario rom from the Library of Congress. ... when ever Nintendo even lets their control die anyways. Maybe in the 2200's...