this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
880 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 244 points 10 months ago (6 children)

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost Nebraska an estimated $300,000. Advocates of the program note that the administrative cost is far outweighed by the $18 million benefit, which the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates would benefit 175,000 Nebraska children who might otherwise go hungry on some days during the summer.

Imagine being such a reprehensible monster that you'd let 175k children in your state starve rather than participate in a federal program that'd help feed them when school is out each summer. It's unconscionable.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It’s unconscionable.

BUt... but... he doesn't believe in welfare! how dare you intrude onto his lack of belief!

(/s. this guy can fuck off to the nether.)

[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I keep hearing that violence isn't the answer but I swear it feels like.... FOR LEGAL REASONS THIS IS SATIRE

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Republicans get off on dead children. It's as simple as that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

It's unconscionable

It's conservative.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 172 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

He doesn't believe in welfare... I see. But what about this welfare?

Pork processor partially owned by Pillen gets $25 million federal grant

Or what about the time he got got $7.8M in pandemic loans and only paid back 2/3 of it. The rest was forgiven. What about the hundreds of thousands he takes every year in federal subsidies? He seems to like that kind of welfare.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago

Don't look for any moral center for these crooks. As you've shown, they are complete and utter hypocrites. He condemns "welfare" because it gets him votes, while he gladly uses taxpayer money to fund himself and his wealthy campaign contributors. It's the GOP long con.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“I don’t believe in welfare”

Feck off and stop accepting federal funding, you fucking welfare queen

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 113 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Fucker believes in welfare when it's called corn subsidies.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Loophole: Poor people must change their name to corn

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But he’s okay with PPP loans being forgiven and also gets USDA subsidies for Pillen Family farms. Source: https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/search?q=Pillen&v=1 Source:https://farm.ewg.org/persondetail.php?custnumber=A09760551

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Those entitled brats made a deal with the devil when they took the money. Greed got the better of them. It always does.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 10 months ago (3 children)

maybe if we called it a 'subsidy'. ha

subsidies for very profitable corporations: a-ok ! tax cuts for people with more money than they could ever actually spend: you betcha! the welfare jobs program we call 'the united states military': ha, no reductons there, ever!

human beings who need to eat food: go fuck yourself

the lack of empathy in the republican party is so stark its hard to fathom.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Just need to get those little tykes their own LLCs and then they can have their lawyers file for federal aid!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So no more federal funding for Nebraska??

If he doesn’t believe in welfare, surely he doesn’t believe in government aid or subsidies

That goes for every citizen of Nebraska, and if you don’t like it vote him out!

I’m tired of this fucking pissing contest between Republicans and people that care about others

[–] [email protected] 56 points 10 months ago (1 children)

33% of Nebraska's operating budget comes from federal grants and funding.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Definition of a welfare state right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Except to our farmers. Well subsidize the shit out of them.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Or even his "holy" rich supporters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He is like Trump. He'll pretend to be whatever you want to believe as long as you give him money. Then he'll rape your kids.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ohh, so when I say, "I don't believe in god" and you still force your Christian morality on me that's OK. When you "don't believe" in a real tangible thing that helps countless numbers of people you can just hand wave that away.

Good to know the douche bag demographic is still overly represented in every facet of American life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So he pays for his campaign out of his own pocket? He doesn't collect donations. Surely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So... He wouldn't mind if the government withholds any financial aid to the state from now on, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“I know the governor a little bit, and he seems to be a reasonable man. He’s a man who is compassionate in conversation,” Love said. “This is out of character. So, obviously, he’s not following his heart. He’s following his politics. He’s falling victim to political posturing, and there’s no excuse for that when it comes to children.”

No, he is not reasonable or compassionate. His actions speak louder than any words he uses sounding like reason or compassion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I live in NYC and my son attends public school. The availability of food to all children just feels right. I know that means my taxes are higher than they would be otherwise, but nutrition is so damn important to a child’s development.

This isn’t welfare. This is caring for children. I’m sure this jackass has a “keep Christ in Christmas” sticker somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

That’s the thing, taxes would be lower if it was spent on society, education, healthcare, infrastructure, etc instead of stadiums and police. This is proven fact, not some ethical debate.

Uplifting society means everything gets better.

Almost like socialism works.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The sadder part of this is that $40 can hardly feed anyone for a week, and that's if you REALY stretch it on bulk rice and beans.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It's worse than that.

It's $40/month, and only for the 3 months of summer to make up for impoverished children not getting meals through school during the summer.

These people are ghouls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

If you don’t believe in a problem, it simply goes away /s

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

“I don’t believe in welfare*.”

* for the poor

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The rich get bailouts, the poor get welfare

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not in the USA. The rich get both. The poor get nothing.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As Chomsky puts it, when it comes to "tough love", the rich get all the love and everyone else gets the "tough" part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see he also self identifies as a Christian... I'm not one to judge, but I once read that countries with the word "democratic" in their names seldom were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

The way that he is opting out is by refusing to spend the ~$300k that is the federal government's requirement to be part of the grant program. I wonder if it would be possible to do an end run around that waste of oxygen, and have a charity raise the ~$300k and accept the $18m the federal government is offering, to be distributed by the charity instead...

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This ass wipe makes 105k salary a year for doing fuck all in a nowhere state of morons, then tells you he doesn't believe in welfare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if welfare is in the Constitution...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

He spent more money sending troops to the border as a publicity stunt. Blaming the poor has always been an effective tactic to divert attention away from their groveling to the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This exact post came up yesterday except with Iowa. Wtf is going on?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I hope he doesn’t have children.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Don't be a villain, Jim Pillen

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

Yeah! Those children should stop being so lazy and go get jobs! Damn children, depending on other people for their well-being.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

Sounds like a real swell guy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Has he also blocked welfare to Nebraska farmers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Americans need to start going to these politician's homes. Don't protest at city Hall, protest in their yard. Make sure their rich neighbors hate it and are inconvenienced. Any time they go out to get coffee or sit down at a restaurant, harass them until they leave. These fucks should get no peace.

load more comments
view more: next ›