Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
What hurts Lemmy more are the communities that are repost bot communities.
I get the need for the repost bots during the starts of the migration of Reddit users to Lemmy, but these days they just make it hard to be seen in some communities, they prevent new original content to develop in those communities as no one will want to post just to have their post drowned out by content that doesn't even come from this place.
I block every community that is just reddit reposts and somehow I still block about 4 or 5 a day
Not any more than reddit is hurt by dead subreddits. I don't see it as a big problem. But I think discovery is a bigger issue - finding new communities.
Yeah I'm pretty tired of manually blocking all the fucking furry porn
This now the third time I'm seeing someone complain about furry porn on Lemmy and I'm just wondering..... Where!?
All I ever see is politics politics politics politics tech billionaire farted politics politics politics Elon Musk politics politics.
You forgot memes and shitposting.
i love it tho 😩 the new generation of linux users is sooooooo suk
I think being able to start your own community so easily is a great feature of Lemmy, and I also think that abandoned communities regardless of when they were started up should be culled or mothballed after a certain duration of inactivity.
But I thought I read a post where this was actually happening anyway, I think it's down to the instance's moderation how strictly policed communities are
My problem is the same community on different instances. I block it once place but it pops up again on my feed in another instance.
Yes, I think so but only indirectly. Distinguishing between the "same" community on different instances or rather identifying the more active one is already pretty hard, the only thing one can really go by is the number of users who have joined. The large number of abandoned copycat communities on 3+ servers doesn't make this easier since a lot of these have a bunch of users but are dead.
A technical solution could be some kind of "hotness" score for instances to identify the interesting/active ones.
Kind of. The squatters with no activity in the communities are annoying. The small niche ones that are just slow seem normal, not everything needs to be popular and busy.
One can request abandoned communities at [email protected]. The mods can either transfer ownership to someone else directly (which keeps all the content intact) or nuke the community so the interested user can start from scratch.
Not many people seem to be aware about this tho, or maybe don't want to ask openly, or feel bad taking over what someone else had started.
So, as for your actual question, I think culling completely inactive, empty communities after a while would be the best option, so the names are freed up again for people who are actually interested in moderating. If the community already has content but no (active) mods, then "adopting" it is the better option, but there should be an additional way to communicate all of that clearer to the userbase. Maybe something like the current "community spotlight" but advertising abandoned communities that are up for adoption ...?
I wasn't aware, thanks!
Userbase is sufficient for generic topics, not specific ones (there are exceptions)
[email protected] is quite active, [email protected] not so much
But people insist on creating incredibly specific niche communities, I'm certain because they want to establish their own fiefdoms when this "blows up".
I think there’s a problem it introduces for users, particularly casual users (which I think we could use a lot more of).
The first problem is discovery. Discovery isn’t something that can be solved server side afaik without adding a unifying layer to act as an indexer, which is kind of feasible but not really in the federated spirit and would need client integration in any case. Discovery could be made better on the client side, but every client I’ve tried so far has no idea how to do results ranking. I’ll search for “politics” and the top result will be from a topic on an instance with zero posts and two subscribers. Some allow users to specify a sort order but miss results present on other clients, and the sort orders are pretty primitive and only allow you to choose one. I’m also honestly unsure how mainstream search engine indexing is supposed to work (eg “Toyota repair reddit”).
The second is content repetition. People (and bots) will frequently post the exact same content to multiple communities and multiple instances. This problem is exacerbated by the lower content rate, which leaves people browsing /all in case someone posted something interesting somewhere. Again, maybe this is something you could do client side with some off the shelf recommendation engine, and I think a great feature would be to have the ability for users to consolidate feeds into a single feed, and even posts (on identical articles, for example) into a single displayed post, such that the conversation could cross multiple instances transparently.
The second is content repetition. People (and bots) will frequently post the exact same content to multiple communities and multiple instances
Kbin shows where links have been posted on other federated servers. It's 10/10 for finding what community is actively discussing a post. I even found a few new subs I gave up on being active here.
@Sabata11792 it's great, we can see at a glance exactly where the active discussions are, when the crossposts are etc.
That update seriously reinvigorated my enthusiasm for KBin as a platform. It's really nice to see a story I find interesting, regardless of magazine/community, then see where folks are actually discussing it.
particularly casual users (which I think we could use a lot more of).
I feel like this isn’t discussed in enough of these meta discussions.
I want, for instance, for a video game discussion to have some input from the dude who has just buys Madden and Call of Duty every year.
Absolutely. I think the entire community benefits when we have 60 year old ladies with gardening tips, foodies discussing fine dining and recipes, pet owners with advice driven by twenty years of owning chihuahuas, and sports people talking about sports (okay, that one’s not so much in my ballpark, as it were, but it’s all part of having communities).
If it’s a community for Linux users, or ML folks (machine learning, not politics), or the otherwise terminally online and tech obsessed, I’m fine with the bar for participation being high. At that point we have a filter rather than a net. But if we want to displace (or at least be a serious alternative) to services like Reddit, we need to make the on-ramp and UX easy for people whose interests are interesting but don’t necessarily include technology beyond knowing how to click on the blue words. If someone can tell me that putting an aspirin in my rhododendron will make it spring forth like Athena from the head of Zeus, I don’t care if they know the fediverse from a hole in the ground.
Also, I made that tip up. Don’t do it, or if you do let me know if it actually works.
a great feature would be to have the ability for users to consolidate feeds into a single feed
We have this at Kbin - collections (like multireddits, but shareable/followable as well); they really help with discovery.
It's a great feature, I hope you get something like it for Lemmy.
I think if we could get something like this and build an Apollo type UI around it, we’d accelerate adoption and some app builder would make a fair chunk of money. I’m not allowed to build apps, but I do hope someone takes this up.
Thank you for this. I know these kinds of resources exist, and I even occasionally remember to make use of them :)
What I’m suggesting is that lemmy (and the community as a whole) would benefit from baking this functionality into the clients (including the web front ends if that’s a big chunk of the user base).
Discoverability is always a problem. Even centralized services such as Reddit have issues - I was still discovering new communities pretty much until the day I left after being on there since Alien Blue came out. It’s worse in decentralized communities because of the nature of the beast. Back in the Usenet days, it was considered a point of pride to know enough to find niche newsgroups, and even ones like alt.hack felt exclusive. Most of it passed around by word of mouth.
Even though the Usenet-like aspects of lemmy give it advantages over centralized sites like Reddit, I think we’ve learned enough over the last 30 years or so that we know user experience is absolutely critical if you want a popular service. I’m going to hazard a guess that when the big, well funded apps start to federate, they’re going to have those kinds of features built in. I’d rather see some of the smaller developers roll out features like that first, so that they can continue to be competitive (as AB and later on Apollo were for Reddit).
We could use some consolidation - if anything, it’s not general enough in some areas, and others are so tightly defined it’s a circle-jerk.
Edit: had a rethink - I mean it’s all very flat. I wouldn’t mind a small hierarchy to find the topic, and more granularity in subgroups.
Pretty much all the copycat communities suck ass. They don't have any of the charm of the originals and are all just poorly-moderated, homogenous crap
I don't think it matters. Communities can specialize in whatever they like and as long as they belong to a large enough instance they should get some level of traction.
There are numerous reasons people might want to split off. For example if an anime community is being dominated by news and release dates maybe fans of a specific show want to go somewhere they can talk in detail and they can find slightly older (ex. 2 months) posts to engage with.
People who want to seek out a specific community can.
Doom scrolling on lemmy is better than reddit
