Members of the SCOTUS are crooked and on the take.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
148 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22058 readers
52 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
impeach and remove. or we should just stop listening to them. they don't have an army to enforce their rulings. not that any left leaning president* would have the balls to do so, but it would be the moral thing to do at this point.
There's no mechanism iirc.
I want it to happen to, I want them to have to report to an ethics committee yearly and if something smells fishy (and this time a little bit like salmon) they should have a trust vote by the American public.
Is it any wonder? The money will always try to influence politics and the Supreme Court is the smallest number of individuals with power besides the president. Get a few on your side and so is the law
That is quite a thorough and damning article. It's infuriating how openly corrupt some members of the supreme court are. Even more infuriating that they get away with it, and that almost certainly won't change because the wealthy own this country.
When the Thomas bribery story came out, Elie Mystal said something like, “You’re telling us that this justice can handle the most complex legal cases but doesn’t understand ethics laws?” Same applies here. They didn’t think they would get caught.
Alito did put out his own statement. Unfortunately it's on WSJ and thoroughly paywalled: https://www.wsj.com/articles/propublica-misleads-its-readers-alito-gifts-disclosure-alaska-singer-23b51eda
Edit: non-paywalled summary of Alito's stonewalling https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4060023-alito-propublica-report-on-luxury-vacation-misleading/
TLDR: "Nothing to see here, move along. And who is ProPublica to question me anyways? -Alito"
He didn't just "put out his own statement". Propublica reached out to him for comment on this article, he didn't respond and then he scrambled to have an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal hours later (always worth saying that that is a Rupert Murdoch owned company). It was a poor attempt at damage control by a weasel trying to get ahead on spinning the narrative.
Alito said that he was invited to fly on Singer’s plane shortly before the trip and that the seat “would have otherwise been vacant.” He defended his failure to report the trip to the public, writing that justices “commonly interpreted” the disclosure requirements to not include “accommodations and transportation for social events.”
This is such an insane defense. Yeah, this casual acquaintance of yours just got you a $100k personal flight for the giggles.
The really telling thing is, I skipped this article the first time because, "Yeah, we know, this isn't news." Took me another look to catch that this was Alito, not Thomas.
Must be really depressing when a crooked Supreme Court Justice story comes out, and there's more than one possibility for who is referring to.
My condolences to America tbh.
If you're going to ever say, "yeah, we know..." you should take a moment to acknowledge that was the exact strategy of bombarding the public with a constant stream of scandal, crime and controversy - to numb you to real issues like this, worth actual outrage and attention.
I know it's overwhelming, I feel it too, but I work to not indulge that feeling when I can avoid it. Glad you came back a second time and read the article.
Oh, 100%. And I was being slightly glib, more of a "oh, they found more?" feeling when I thought it was Thomas. Not really a numbing of outrage as much as just another data point. But you're completely right about the strategy.
Corruption on full display … with zero consequences.
Wonderful journalism, wow. I will say that it did take too long to read that Leonard Leo planned/coordinated the whole trip. This Supreme Court is so fully out in the open fucked.
In a legitimate society with a sliver of integrity this would not be tolerated.
Alito seems untouchable, there are dozens of stories like this about him and his wife.
view more: next ›